Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26716012›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology2015

Performance of the Cobas(®) Influenza A/B Assay for Rapid Pcr-Based Detection of Influenza Compared to Prodesse ProFlu+ and Viral Culture.

L Chen, Y Tian, S Chen, O Liesenfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of microbiology & immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Multiplex PCR system for the rapid diagnosis of respiratory virus infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Rapid Tests for Influenza, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and Other Respiratory Viruses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Performance and ease of use of a molecular point-of-care test for influenza A/B and RSV in patients presenting to primary care.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Cost-Effective Respiratory Virus Testing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Are Rapid Influenza Antigen Tests Still Clinically Useful in Today's Molecular Diagnostics World?Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Point-of-care diagnostics for respiratory viral infections.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

L ChenRoche Molecular Systems , Marlborough 01752, MA, USA.
Y TianRoche Molecular Systems , Marlborough 01752, MA, USA.
S ChenRoche Molecular Systems , Marlborough 01752, MA, USA.
O LiesenfeldMedical and Scientific Affairs, Roche Molecular Systems , Pleasanton 94588, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of influenza is important for patient management and infection control. We determined the performance of the cobas(®) Influenza A/B assay, a rapid automated nucleic acid assay performed on the cobas(®) Liat System for qualitative detection of influenza A and influenza B from nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens. Retrospective frozen and prospectively collected NP swabs from patients with signs and symptoms of influenza collected in universal transport medium (UTM) were tested at multiple sites including CLIA-waived sites using the cobas® Influenza A/B assay. Results were compared to the Prodesse Pro-Flu+ assay and to viral culture. Compared to the Prodesse ProFlu+ Assay, sensitivities of the cobas(®) Influenza A/B assay for influenza A and B were 97.7 and 98.6%, respectively; specificity was 99.2 and 99.4%. Compared to viral culture, the cobas(®) Influenza A/B assay showed sensitivities of 97.5 and 96.9% for influenza virus A and B, respectively; specificities were 97.9% for both viruses. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/sequencing showed that the majority of viral culture negative but cobas(®) Influenza A/B positive results were true positive results, indicating that the cobas(®) Influenza A/B assay has higher sensitivity compared to viral culture. In conclusion, the excellent accuracy, rapid time to result, and remarkable ease of use make the cobas(®) Influenza A/B nucleic acid assay for use on the cobas(®) Liat System a highly suitable point-of-care solution for the management of patients with suspected influenza A and B infection.

Indexed as

diagnosisinfluenzainfluenza Ainfluenza BPCRpoint of caresensitivityviral culture

Identifiers

PMID26716012
PMCPMC4681351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.