Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26715999›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2015

Regulatory mechanisms of group distributions in a gregarious arthropod.

Pierre Broly, Romain Mullier, Cédric Devigne, Jean-Louis Deneubourg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pierre BrolyUnité d'Ecologie Sociale , Université Libre de Bruxelles, Campus de la Plaine , Bruxelles, Belgium.
Romain MullierLaboratoire Ecologie et Biodiversité , Faculté de Gestion, Economie et Sciences , UCLILLE, Lille, France.
Cédric DevigneLaboratoire Ecologie et Biodiversité , Faculté de Gestion, Economie et Sciences , UCLILLE, Lille, France ; Forensic Taphonomy Unit , University Lille Nord de France-UDSL , 59000 Lille, France.
Jean-Louis DeneubourgUnité d'Ecologie Sociale , Université Libre de Bruxelles, Campus de la Plaine , Bruxelles, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a patchy environment, how social animals manage conspecific and environmental cues in their choice of habitat is a leading issue for understanding their spatial distribution and their exploitation of resources. Here, we experimentally tested the effects of environmental heterogeneities (artificial shelters) and some of their characteristics (size and fragmentation) on the aggregation process of a common species of terrestrial isopod (Crustacea). One hundred individuals were introduced into three different heterogeneous set-ups and in a homogeneous set-up. In the four set-ups, the populations split into two aggregates: one large (approx. 70 individuals) and one smaller (approx. 20 individuals). These aggregates were not randomly distributed in the arena but were formed diametrically opposite from one another. The similarity of the results among the four set-ups shows that under experimental conditions, the environmental heterogeneities have a low impact on the aggregation dynamics and spatial patterns of the isopod, merely serving to increase the probability of nucleation of the larger aggregation at these points. By contrast, the regulation of aggregate sizes and the regular distribution of groups are signatures of local amplification processes, in agreement with the short-range activator and long-range inhibitor model (scale-dependent feedbacks). In other words, we show how small-scale interactions may govern large-scale spatial patterns. This experimental illustration of spatial self-organization is an important step towards comprehension of the complex game of competition among groups in social species.

Indexed as

aggregationgroup sizelocal activation/long-range inhibition mechanismpatchy environmentscale-dependent feedbacks

Identifiers

PMID26715999
PMCPMC4680614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.