Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26715982›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of radiology : a quarterly journal published by the Iranian Radiological Society2015

Perianal Fistula With and Without Abscess: Assessment of Fistula Activity Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Selim Bakan, Deniz Cebi Olgun, Sedat Giray Kandemirli, Onur Tutar, Cesur Samanci, Suleyman Dikici, Osman Simsek, Babak Rafiee, Ibrahim Adaletli, Ismail Mihmanli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of radiology : a quarterly journal published by the Iranian Radiological Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Selim BakanDepartment of Radiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Deniz Cebi OlgunDepartment of Radiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sedat Giray KandemirliDepartment of Radiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Onur TutarDepartment of Radiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cesur SamanciDepartment of Radiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Suleyman DikiciDepartment of Radiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Osman SimsekDepartment of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Babak RafieeDepartment of Radiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ibrahim AdaletliDepartment of Radiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ismail MihmanliDepartment of Radiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly accurate for the depiction of both the primary tract of fistula and abscesses, in patients with perianal disease. In addition, MRI can be used to evaluate the activity of fistulas, which is a significant factor for determining the therapeutic strategy.

objectivesThis study aimed to determine the usefulness of diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI for assessing activity and visibility of perianal fistula. PATIENTS AND

methodsFifty-three patients with 56 perianal fistulas were included in the current retrospective study. The T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and DWMRI were performed and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of fistulas were measured. Fistulas were classified into two groups: only perianal fistulas and fistulas accompanied by abscess. Fistulas were also classified into two groups, based on clinical findings: positive inflammatory activity (PIA) and negative inflammatory activity (NIA).

resultsMean ADC value (mm(2)/s) of PIA group was significantly lower than that of NIA group, regarding lesions in patients with abscess-associated fistulas (1.371 × 10(-3) ± 0.168 × 10(-3) vs. 1.586 × 10(-3) ± 0.136 × 10(-3); P = 0.036). No statistically significant difference was found in mean ADC values between PIA and NIA groups, in patients with only perianal fistulas (P = 0.507). Perianal fistula visibility was greater with combined evaluation of T2WI and DWMRI than with T2WI, for two reviewers (P = 0.046 and P = 0.014).

conclusionThe DWMRI is a useful technique for evaluating activity of fistulas with abscess. Perianal fistula visibility is greater with combined T2WI and DWMRI than T2WI alone.

Indexed as

AbscessDiffusionInflammationMagnetic Resonance ImagingPerianal Fistula

Identifiers

PMID26715982
PMCPMC4691529
OpenAlexW1918683810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.