Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26715669›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

Reconciling Differences in Pool-GWAS Between Populations: A Case Study of Female Abdominal Pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Lukas Endler, Andrea J Betancourt, Viola Nolte, Christian Schlötterer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Naturally Occurring Variability in the Regulatory Region of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evolution letters · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pleiotropic Effects ofFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genomics of coloration in natural animal populations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lukas EndlerInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Andrea J BetancourtInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Viola NolteInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Christian SchlöttererInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria christian.schloetterer@vetmeduni.ac.at.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 22725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The degree of concordance between populations in the genetic architecture of a given trait is an important issue in medical and evolutionary genetics. Here, we address this problem, using a replicated pooled genome-wide association study approach (Pool-GWAS) to compare the genetic basis of variation in abdominal pigmentation in female European and South African Drosophila melanogaster. We find that, in both the European and the South African flies, variants near the tan and bric-à-brac 1 (bab1) genes are most strongly associated with pigmentation. However, the relative contribution of these loci differs: in the European populations, tan outranks bab1, while the converse is true for the South African flies. Using simulations, we show that this result can be explained parsimoniously, without invoking different causal variants between the populations, by a combination of frequency differences between the two populations and dominance for the causal alleles at the bab1 locus. Our results demonstrate the power of cost-effective, replicated Pool-GWAS to shed light on differences in the genetic architecture of a given trait between populations.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenome-Wide Association StudyPhenotypeAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemalePigmentationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LocidominanceDrosophila melanogastergenome-wide association studyGWASpigmentationpooled sequencing

Identifiers

PMID26715669
PMCPMC4788253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.