Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26715547›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2016

Pharmaceutical care program for onco-hematologic outpatients: safety, efficiency and patient satisfaction.

Almudena Ribed, Rosa María Romero-Jiménez, Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana, Irene Iglesias-Peinado, Ana Herranz-Alonso, Carlos Codina, Maria Sanjurjo-Sáez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. An UHPLC-MS/MS method for quantification of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib in human serum.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Almudena RibedGregorio Marañón University General Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Rosa María Romero-JiménezGregorio Marañón University General Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Vicente Escudero-VilaplanaGregorio Marañón University General Hospital, Madrid, Spain. vicente.escudero@salud.madrid.org.
Irene Iglesias-PeinadoComplutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Herranz-AlonsoGregorio Marañón University General Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos CodinaBarcelona Clinic University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Sanjurjo-SáezGregorio Marañón University General Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-administration of oral chemotherapy regimens in the home setting leading to new challenges in the health system.

objectiveTo develop and evaluate a comprehensive pharmaceutical care program for cancer outpatients treated with oral antineoplastic agents.

settingA Spanish tertiary hospital.

methodsDuring 2012, a comprehensive pharmaceutical care program was elaborated following the standards recommended by ASCO. It comprised a standard procedure focusing on: drug indication, dosing regimen, required laboratory tests, route of administration, interactions with other current medications and adverse events; a checklist and informational brochures. A pharmaceutical follow up was defined and structured into three clinical interviews over 6 months which focused on safety and efficiency outcomes. Patients starting treatment with oral antineoplastic agents during 2011 (control group) without pharmacist monitoring were compared to patients beginning treatment at some point in 2013 who were prospectively monitored by a pharmacist (intervention group). Statistical analysis was performed by the statistical program SPSS, 21.0 and p < 0.05 was considered significant.

main outcome measuresPatient demographics and clinical data were recorded. The primary endpoint was safety outcomes: detection of drug related problems, drug interactions, and adverse events. Adherence, permanence and patient satisfaction were also collected.

resultsA total of 249 patients were enrolled in the study. Two hundred and seventy-five medication errors were recorded [106 in the control group and 169 in the intervention group (p = 0.008)]. The pharmacist intervened in 362 occasions being accepted 88.8 % of the time, mainly to reinforce patient education and literacy and giving information on co-administration with other drugs and herbal medicines. Adherent patients increased at the 6th month of treatment in the intervention group by 20 % (p < 0.001). High satisfaction was reported.

conclusionThe program has been implemented and evaluated successfully. It ensures a high quality and standard of pharmaceutical care with high patient satisfaction rate and the key points to prioritize for improvement in terms of safety (interactions and administration errors) and efficiency (adherence and permanence) of oral antineoplastic agents.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPharmaceutical ServicesAdministration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPharmacy Service, HospitalRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsOncologyOral antineoplastic agentsOutpatientPatient satisfactionPharmaceutical careSafetySpain

Identifiers

PMID26715547
OpenAlexW2197193943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.