ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2016
Pharmaceutical care program for onco-hematologic outpatients: safety, efficiency and patient satisfaction.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of healthcare professional-delivered health literacy interventions on patient reported outcomes in cancer patients - a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical and economic impact of pharmacist interventions to identify drug-related problems in multidisciplinary cancer care: a prospective trial.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Article
- Oncoral Follow-Up for Outpatients Treated with Oral Anticancer Drugs Assessed by Relative Dose Intensity.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Early follow-up of outpatients with oral anticancer therapy in the ONCORAL multidisciplinary community-hospital program.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of pharmacist-managed oncology ambulatory care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Taiwan.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Clinical pharmacy services are reimbursed in Germany: challenges of real world implementation remain.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
- New Oral Antitumor Drugs and Medication Safety in Uro-Oncology: Implications for Clinical Practice Based on a Subgroup Analysis of the AMBORA Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Domains of Structured Oral Anticancer Medication Programs: A Scoping Review.Oncology nursing forum · 2022Article
- ONS Guidelines™ to Support Patient Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medications.Oncology nursing forum · 2022Article
- Investigation of Intervention Solutions to Enhance Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medicines in Adults: Overview of Reviews.JMIR cancer · 2022Review
- An UHPLC-MS/MS method for quantification of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib in human serum.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2022Article
- Real-life drug-drug and herb-drug interactions in outpatients taking oral anticancer drugs: comparison with databases.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Clinical Pharmacy Services in Ambulatory Oncology: An Environmental Scan of the Canadian Practice Landscape.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2022Article
- Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy Management and Safety: A Practical Tool From a Multidisciplinary Team Perspective.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Patients Satisfaction with Pharmaceutical Care and Associated Factors in the Southwestern Ethiopia.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Assessment of Physician's Knowledge of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions: An Online Survey in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Effect of a Mobile App for the Pharmacotherapeutic Follow-Up of Patients With Cancer on Their Health Outcomes: Quasi-Experimental Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-administration of oral chemotherapy regimens in the home setting leading to new challenges in the health system.
objectiveTo develop and evaluate a comprehensive pharmaceutical care program for cancer outpatients treated with oral antineoplastic agents.
settingA Spanish tertiary hospital.
methodsDuring 2012, a comprehensive pharmaceutical care program was elaborated following the standards recommended by ASCO. It comprised a standard procedure focusing on: drug indication, dosing regimen, required laboratory tests, route of administration, interactions with other current medications and adverse events; a checklist and informational brochures. A pharmaceutical follow up was defined and structured into three clinical interviews over 6 months which focused on safety and efficiency outcomes. Patients starting treatment with oral antineoplastic agents during 2011 (control group) without pharmacist monitoring were compared to patients beginning treatment at some point in 2013 who were prospectively monitored by a pharmacist (intervention group). Statistical analysis was performed by the statistical program SPSS, 21.0 and p < 0.05 was considered significant.
main outcome measuresPatient demographics and clinical data were recorded. The primary endpoint was safety outcomes: detection of drug related problems, drug interactions, and adverse events. Adherence, permanence and patient satisfaction were also collected.
resultsA total of 249 patients were enrolled in the study. Two hundred and seventy-five medication errors were recorded [106 in the control group and 169 in the intervention group (p = 0.008)]. The pharmacist intervened in 362 occasions being accepted 88.8 % of the time, mainly to reinforce patient education and literacy and giving information on co-administration with other drugs and herbal medicines. Adherent patients increased at the 6th month of treatment in the intervention group by 20 % (p < 0.001). High satisfaction was reported.
conclusionThe program has been implemented and evaluated successfully. It ensures a high quality and standard of pharmaceutical care with high patient satisfaction rate and the key points to prioritize for improvement in terms of safety (interactions and administration errors) and efficiency (adherence and permanence) of oral antineoplastic agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.