Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26715538›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2015

Sample size and power calculations for detecting changes in malaria transmission using antibody seroconversion rate.

Nuno Sepúlveda, Carlos Daniel Paulino, Chris Drakeley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Serology reveals comparable patterns in the transmission intensities ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Naturally acquired antibody response toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nuno SepúlvedaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. nuno.sepulveda@lshtm.ac.uk.
Carlos Daniel PaulinoCenter of Statistics and Applications of University of Lisbon, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Bloco C6-Piso 4, 1749-1016, Lisbon, Portugal. dpaulino@ist.utl.pt.
Chris DrakeleyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. chris.drakeley@lshtm.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 091924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have highlighted the use of serological data in detecting a reduction in malaria transmission intensity. These studies have typically used serology as an adjunct measure and no formal examination of sample size calculations for this approach has been conducted.

methodsA sample size calculator is proposed for cross-sectional surveys using data simulation from a reverse catalytic model assuming a reduction in seroconversion rate (SCR) at a given change point before sampling. This calculator is based on logistic approximations for the underlying power curves to detect a reduction in SCR in relation to the hypothesis of a stable SCR for the same data. Sample sizes are illustrated for a hypothetical cross-sectional survey from an African population assuming a known or unknown change point.

resultsOverall, data simulation demonstrates that power is strongly affected by assuming a known or unknown change point. Small sample sizes are sufficient to detect strong reductions in SCR, but invariantly lead to poor precision of estimates for current SCR. In this situation, sample size is better determined by controlling the precision of SCR estimates. Conversely larger sample sizes are required for detecting more subtle reductions in malaria transmission but those invariantly increase precision whilst reducing putative estimation bias.

conclusionsThe proposed sample size calculator, although based on data simulation, shows promise of being easily applicable to a range of populations and survey types. Since the change point is a major source of uncertainty, obtaining or assuming prior information about this parameter might reduce both the sample size and the chance of generating biased SCR estimates.

Indexed as

Disease Transmission, InfectiousStatistics as TopicAntibodies, ProtozoanCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalariaSample SizeSeroconversionAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID26715538
PMCPMC4696297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.