Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26715526›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Comparative genomics of Fructobacillus spp. and Leuconostoc spp. reveals niche-specific evolution of Fructobacillus spp.

Akihito Endo, Yasuhiro Tanizawa, Naoto Tanaka, Shintaro Maeno, Himanshu Kumar, Yuh Shiwa, Sanae Okada, Hirofumi Yoshikawa, Leon Dicks, Junichi Nakagawa and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Convergent reductive evolution in bee-associated lactic acid bacteria.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Do amino and fatty acid profiles of pollen provisions correlate with bacterial microbiomes in the mason beePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Phylogenomic and comparative genomic analyses ofInternational journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Niche-specific adaptation ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Akihito EndoDepartment of Food and Cosmetic Science, Faculty of Bioindustry, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 196 Yasaka, Abashiri, Hokkaido, 099-2493, Japan. a3endou@bioindustry.nodai.ac.jp.
Yasuhiro TanizawaDepartment of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan. ytanizaw@nig.ac.jp.
Naoto TanakaNODAI Culture Collection Centre, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan. n3tanaka@nodai.ac.jp.
Shintaro MaenoDepartment of Food and Cosmetic Science, Faculty of Bioindustry, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 196 Yasaka, Abashiri, Hokkaido, 099-2493, Japan. 47715003@bioindustry.nodai.ac.jp.
Himanshu KumarFunctional Foods Forum, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. kumar.himanshu@utu.fi.
Yuh ShiwaGenome Research Center, NODAI Research Institute, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan. y3shiwa@icloud.com.
Sanae OkadaNODAI Culture Collection Centre, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan. sokada@nodai.ac.jp.
Hirofumi YoshikawaGenome Research Center, NODAI Research Institute, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan. hiyoshik@nodai.ac.jp.
Leon DicksDepartment of Microbiology, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa. lmtd@sun.ac.za.
Junichi NakagawaDepartment of Food and Cosmetic Science, Faculty of Bioindustry, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 196 Yasaka, Abashiri, Hokkaido, 099-2493, Japan. j3nakaga@bioindustry.nodai.ac.jp.
Masanori AritaCenter for Information Biology, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan. arita@nig.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFructobacillus spp. in fructose-rich niches belong to the family Leuconostocaceae. They were originally classified as Leuconostoc spp., but were later grouped into a novel genus, Fructobacillus, based on their phylogenetic position, morphology and specific biochemical characteristics. The unique characters, so called fructophilic characteristics, had not been reported in the group of lactic acid bacteria, suggesting unique evolution at the genome level. Here we studied four draft genome sequences of Fructobacillus spp. and compared their metabolic properties against those of Leuconostoc spp.

resultsFructobacillus species possess significantly less protein coding sequences in their small genomes. The number of genes was significantly smaller in carbohydrate transport and metabolism. Several other metabolic pathways, including TCA cycle, ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis and phosphotransferase systems, were characterized as discriminative pathways between the two genera. The adhE gene for bifunctional acetaldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase, and genes for subunits of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex were absent in Fructobacillus spp. The two genera also show different levels of GC contents, which are mainly due to the different GC contents at the third codon position.

conclusionThe present genome characteristics in Fructobacillus spp. suggest reductive evolution that took place to adapt to specific niches.

Indexed as

Base CompositionDNA, BacterialGenome, BacterialGenomicsLeuconostocaceaeDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID26715526
PMCPMC4696137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.