ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2015
Classification of follicular lymphoma: the effect of computer aid on pathologists grading.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Automated scoring methods for quantitative interpretation of Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Mitigating bias in prostate cancer diagnosis using synthetic data for improved AI driven Gleason grading.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in haematolymphoid diagnostics.Histopathology · 2025Review
- Detection of centroblast cells in H&E stained whole slide image based on object detection.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of Ki67 Proliferation Index in Gastrointestinal Non-Hodgkin Large B-Cell Lymphomas: The Conventional Method of Evaluation or AI Evaluation?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Creating learning health systems and the emerging role of biomedical informatics.Learning health systems · 2022Article
- Machine Learning Applications in the Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Hematological Diseases.Clinical hematology international · 2021Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Microscopy Applications in Diagnostic Hematopathology.Cancers · 2020Review
- Report on computational assessment of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group.NPJ breast cancer · 2020Review
- PanCancer insights from The Cancer Genome Atlas: the pathologist's perspective.The Journal of pathology · 2018Review
- Predicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Informatics Approaches to Address New Challenges in the Classification of Lymphoid Malignancies.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2018Review
- Optimized generation of high-resolution phantom images using cGAN: Application to quantification of Ki67 breast cancer images.PloS one · 2018Article
- An Image Analysis Resource for Cancer Research: PIIP-Pathology Image Informatics Platform for Visualization, Analysis, and Management.Cancer research · 2017Article
- FOXP3-stained image analysis for follicular lymphoma: Optimal adaptive thresholding with maximal nucleus coverage.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2017Article
- New developments in the pathology of malignant lymphoma. A review of the literature published from January-April 2016.Journal of hematopathology · 2016Review
- Primary follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the ureter: A case report and literature review.Oncology letters · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFollicular lymphoma (FL) is one of the most common lymphoid malignancies in the western world. FL cases are stratified into three histological grades based on the average centroblast count per high power field (HPF). The centroblast count is performed manually by the pathologist using an optical microscope and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue section. Although this is the current clinical practice, it suffers from high inter- and intra-observer variability and is vulnerable to sampling bias.
methodsIn this paper, we present a system, called Follicular Lymphoma Grading System (FLAGS), to assist the pathologist in grading FL cases. We also assess the effect of FLAGS on accuracy of expert and inexperienced readers. FLAGS automatically identifies possible HPFs for examination by analyzing H&E and CD20 stains, before classifying them into low or high risk categories. The pathologist is first asked to review the slides according to the current routine clinical practice, before being presented with FLAGS classification via color-coded map. The accuracy of the readers with and without FLAGS assistance is measured.
resultsFLAGS was used by four experts (board-certified hematopathologists) and seven pathology residents on 20 FL slides. Access to FLAGS improved overall reader accuracy with the biggest improvement seen among residents. An average AUC value of 0.75 was observed which generally indicates "acceptable" diagnostic performance.
conclusionsThe results of this study show that FLAGS can be useful in increasing the pathologists' accuracy in grading the tissue. To the best of our knowledge, this study measure, for the first time, the effect of computerized image analysis on pathologists' grading of follicular lymphoma. When fully developed, such systems have the potential to reduce sampling bias by examining an increased proportion of HPFs within follicle regions, as well as to reduce inter- and intra-reader variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.