Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26715442›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2015

A nested cohort study of 6,248 early breast cancer patients treated in neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy trials investigating the prognostic value of chemotherapy-related toxicities.

Jean E Abraham, Louise Hiller, Leila Dorling, Anne-Laure Vallier, Janet Dunn, Sarah Bowden, Susan Ingle, Linda Jones, Richard Hardy, Christopher Twelves and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pathological significance of MAD2L1 in breast cancer: an immunohistochemical study and meta analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jean E AbrahamDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 193, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. ja344@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Louise HillerWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. l.hiller@warwick.ac.uk.
Leila DorlingStrangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK. ld429@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Anne-Laure VallierDepartment of Oncology, Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Box 279 (S4), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. anne-laure.vallier@addenbrookes.nhs.uk.
Janet DunnWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. j.a.dunn@warwick.ac.uk.
Sarah BowdenCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. s.j.bowden@bham.ac.uk.
Susan IngleDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 193, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. susan.ingle@addenbrookes.nhs.uk.
Linda JonesDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 193, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. linda.jones@addenbrookes.nhs.uk.
Richard HardyDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 193, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. richard.hardy@addenbrookes.nhs.uk.
Christopher TwelvesLevel 4, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology and Leeds Experimental Cancer Medical Centre, St James Institute of Oncology, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK. c.j.twelves@leeds.ac.uk.
Christopher J PooleWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. christopher.poole@warwick.ac.uk.
Paul D P PharoahStrangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK. pp10001@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Carlos CaldasDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 193, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. carlos.caldas@cruk.cam.ac.uk.
Helena M EarlDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 193, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. hme22@cam.ac.uk.
NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11010Cancer Research UK 15958Cancer Research UK 16465Cancer Research UK 16561Cancer Research UK 16942Cancer Research UK C10097/A7484Cancer Research UK C507/A6306Cancer Research UK C57/A4180Medical Research Council MR/M008975/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between chemotherapy-related toxicities and prognosis is unclear. Previous studies have examined the association of myelosuppression parameters or neuropathy with survival and reported conflicting results. This study aims to investigate 13 common chemotherapy toxicities and their association with relapse-free survival and breast cancer-specific survival.

methodsChemotherapy-related toxicities were collected prospectively for 6,248 women with early-stage breast cancer from four randomised controlled trials (NEAT; BR9601; tAnGo; Neo-tAnGo). Cox proportional-hazards modelling was used to analyse the association between chemotherapy-related toxicities and both breast cancer-specific survival and relapse-free survival. Models included important prognostic factors and stratified by variables violating the proportional hazards assumption.

resultsMultivariable analysis identified severe neutropenia (grades ≥3) as an independent predictor of relapse-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76-0.97; P = 0.02). A similar trend was seen for breast cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-1.01; P = 0.06). Normal/low BMI patients experienced more severe neutropenia (P = 0.008) than patients with higher BMI. Patients with fatigue (grades ≥3) showed a trend towards reduced survival (breast cancer-specific survival: HR = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.99-1.37; P = 0.06). In the NEAT/BR9601 sub-group analysis by treatment component, this effect was statistically significant (HR = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.13-2.30; P = 0.009).

conclusionsThis large study shows a significant association between chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and increased survival. It also identifies a strong relationship between low/normal BMI and increased incidence of severe neutropenia. It provides evidence to support the development of neutropenia-adapted clinical trials to investigate optimal dose calculation and its impact on clinical outcome. This is important in populations where obesity may lead to sub-optimal chemotherapy doses.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26715442
PMCPMC4693418
OpenAlexW2220013430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.