ArticleExperimental brain research2016
The effect of retinal image error update rate on human vestibulo-ocular reflex gain adaptation.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal Human Passive Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Does Not Rely on Passive Training.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018Trial
- The potential role of retinal slip in National Football League (NFL) officiating and its effect on on-field decision making: mechanisms and countermeasures.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Cervico-Ocular and Vestibulo-Ocular Reflexes in Subclinical Neck Pain and Healthy Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Reduces when Training Demand Variability Increases.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Article
- The instantaneous training demand drives vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation.Experimental brain research · 2020Article
- Retinal Image Slip Must Pass the Threshold for Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020Article
- Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Training: Time Beats Quantity.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018Article
- Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation: Consolidation Time Between Repeated Training Blocks Improves Retention.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018Article
- The Effect of Visual Contrast on Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018Article
- Eye Movements Are Correctly Timed During Walking Despite Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2017Article
- Aging Increases Compensatory Saccade Amplitude in the Video Head Impulse Test.Frontiers in neurology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary function of the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is to stabilise images on the retina during head movements. Retinal image movement is the likely feedback signal that drives VOR modification/adaptation for different viewing contexts. However, it is not clear whether a retinal image position or velocity error is used primarily as the feedback signal. Recent studies examining this signal are limited because they used near viewing to modify the VOR. However, it is not known whether near viewing drives VOR adaptation or is a pre-programmed contextual cue that modifies the VOR. Our study is based on analysis of the VOR evoked by horizontal head impulses during an established adaptation task. Fourteen human subjects underwent incremental unilateral VOR adaptation training and were tested using the scleral search coil technique over three separate sessions. The update rate of the laser target position (source of the retinal image error signal) used to drive VOR adaptation was different for each session [50 (once every 20 ms), 20 and 15/35 Hz]. Our results show unilateral VOR adaptation occurred at 50 and 20 Hz for both the active (23.0 ± 9.6 and 11.9 ± 9.1% increase on adapting side, respectively) and passive VOR (13.5 ± 14.9, 10.4 ± 12.2%). At 15 Hz, unilateral adaptation no longer occurred in the subject group for both the active and passive VOR, whereas individually, 4/9 subjects tested at 15 Hz had significant adaptation. Our findings suggest that 1-2 retinal image position error signals every 100 ms (i.e. target position update rate 15-20 Hz) are sufficient to drive VOR adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26715411What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.