Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26715297›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2015

The understanding of core pharmacological concepts among health care students in their final semester.

Patrik Aronsson, Shirley Booth, Staffan Hägg, Karin Kjellgren, Ann Zetterqvist, Gunnar Tobin, Margareta Reis

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrik AronssonDepartment Pharmacology, Institution of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. patrik.aronsson@pharm.gu.se.
Shirley BoothDepartment Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies, Faculty of Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. shirley.booth@gu.se.
Staffan HäggDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Division of Drug Research/Clinical Pharmacology, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden. staffan.hagg@liu.se.
Karin KjellgrenDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Division of Drug Research/Clinical Pharmacology, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden. karin.kjellgren@liu.se.
Ann ZetterqvistDepartment Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies, Faculty of Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. ann.zetterqvist@ped.gu.se.
Gunnar TobinDepartment Pharmacology, Institution of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. gunnar.tobin@pharm.gu.se.
Margareta ReisDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Division of Drug Research/Clinical Pharmacology, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden. margareta.reis@liu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe overall aim of the study was to explore health care students´ understanding of core concepts in pharmacology.

methodAn interview study was conducted among twelve students in their final semester of the medical program (n = 4), the nursing program (n = 4), and the specialist nursing program in primary health care (n = 4) from two Swedish universities. The participants were individually presented with two pharmacological clinically relevant written patient cases, which they were to analyze and propose a solution to. Participants were allowed to use the Swedish national drug formulary. Immediately thereafter the students were interviewed about their assessments. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was used to identify units of meaning in each interview. The units were organized into three clusters: pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and drug interactions. Subsequent procedure consisted of scoring the quality of students´ understanding of core concepts. Non-parametric statistics were employed.

resultsThe study participants were in general able to define pharmacological concepts, but showed less ability to discuss the meaning of the concepts in depth and to implement these in a clinical context. The participants found it easier to grasp concepts related to pharmacodynamics than pharmacokinetics and drug interactions.

conclusionThese results indicate that education aiming to prepare future health care professionals for understanding of more complex pharmacological reasoning and decision-making needs to be more focused and effective.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsStudents, MedicalStudents, NursingAgedDrug TherapyFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPharmacology, ClinicalQualitative ResearchStatistics, NonparametricSweden

Identifiers

PMID26715297
PMCPMC4696213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.