Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26715215›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2016

Combining 'Bottom-Up' and 'Top-Down' Methods to Assess Ethnic Difference in Clearance: Bitopertin as an Example.

Sheng Feng, Jun Shi, Neil Parrott, Pei Hu, Cornelia Weber, Meret Martin-Facklam, Tomohisa Saito, Richard Peck

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pharmacokinetic profile of bitopertin, a selective GlyTNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheng FengRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Building 6, Lane 917, Ha Lei Road, Pudong, Shanghai, China.
Jun ShiRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Building 6, Lane 917, Ha Lei Road, Pudong, Shanghai, China. jun.shi.js1@roche.com.
Neil ParrottRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Pei HuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Cornelia WeberRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Meret Martin-FacklamRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Tomohisa SaitoChugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Richard PeckRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHRoche (China) · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesWe propose a strategy for studying ethnopharmacology by conducting sequential physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) prediction (a 'bottom-up' approach) and population pharmacokinetic (popPK) confirmation (a 'top-down' approach), or in reverse order, depending on whether the purpose is ethnic effect assessment for a new molecular entity under development or a tool for ethnic sensitivity prediction for a given pathway. The strategy is exemplified with bitopertin.

methodsA PBPK model was built using Simcyp(®) to simulate the pharmacokinetics of bitopertin and to predict the ethnic sensitivity in clearance, given pharmacokinetic data in just one ethnicity. Subsequently, a popPK model was built using NONMEM(®) to assess the effect of ethnicity on clearance, using human data from multiple ethnic groups. A comparison was made to confirm the PBPK-based ethnic sensitivity prediction, using the results of the popPK analysis.

resultsPBPK modelling predicted that the bitopertin geometric mean clearance values after 20 mg oral administration in Caucasians would be 1.32-fold and 1.27-fold higher than the values in Chinese and Japanese, respectively. The ratios of typical clearance in Caucasians to the values in Chinese and Japanese estimated by popPK analysis were 1.20 and 1.17, respectively. The popPK analysis results were similar to the PBPK modelling results.

conclusionAs a general framework, we propose that PBPK modelling should be considered to predict ethnic sensitivity of pharmacokinetics prior to any human data and/or with data in only one ethnicity. In some cases, this will be sufficient to guide initial dose selection in different ethnicities. After clinical trials in different ethnicities, popPK analysis can be used to confirm ethnic differences and to support dose justification and labelling. PBPK modelling prediction and popPK analysis confirmation can complement each other to assess ethnic differences in pharmacokinetics at different drug development stages.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleModels, BiologicalWhite PeopleAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedPiperazinesSulfonesYoung Adult(4-(3-fluoro-5-trifluoromethylpyridin-2-yl)piperazin-1-yl)(5-methanesulfonyl-2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1-methylethoxy)phenyl)methanonePiperazinesSulfones

Identifiers

PMID26715215
PMCPMC4916198
OpenAlexW2214717060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.