Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26715151›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Incorporating shared savings programs into primary care: from theory to practice.

Arthur P Hayen, Michael J van den Berg, Bert R Meijboom, Jeroen N Struijs, Gert P Westert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Building alternative payment models in health care.Frontiers in health services · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Do we care about high-cost patients? Estimating the savings on health spending by integrated care.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arthur P HayenTilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, dpt. Tranzo (Scientific center for care and welfare), Tilburg University, Address: PO Box 90153, 5000, Tilburg, LE, The Netherlands. a.p.hayen@tilburguniversity.edu.
Michael J van den BergNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Health and Society, Address: PO Box 1, 3720, Bilthoven, BA, The Netherlands. michael.van.den.berg@rivm.nl.
Bert R MeijboomTilburg School of Economics and Management, dpt. CentER (Center for Economic Research), Tilburg University, Address: PO Box 90153, 5000, Tilburg, LE, The Netherlands. b.r.meijboom@uvt.nl.
Jeroen N StruijsNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, Address: PO Box, 3720, Bilthoven, BA, The Netherlands. jeroen.struijs@rivm.nl.
Gert P WestertIQ Healthcare (Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Address: PO Box 9101, 114, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, The Netherlands. gert.westert@radboudumc.nl.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLTilburg University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn several countries, health care policies gear toward strengthening the position of primary care physicians. Primary care physicians are increasingly expected to take accountability for overall spending and quality. Yet traditional models of paying physicians do not provide adequate incentives for taking on this new role. Under a so-called shared savings program physicians are instead incentivized to take accountability for spending and quality, as the program lets them share in cost savings when quality targets are met. We provide a structured approach to designing a shared savings program for primary care, and apply this approach to the design of a shared savings program for a Dutch chain of primary care providers, which is currently being piloted.

methodsBased on the literature, we defined five building blocks of shared savings models that encompass the definition of the scope of the program, the calculation of health care expenditures, the construction of a savings benchmark, the assessment of savings and the rules and conditions under which savings are shared. We apply insights from a variety of literatures to assess the relative merits of alternative design choices within these building blocks. The shared savings program uses an econometric model of provider expenditures as an input to calculating a casemix-corrected benchmark.

resultsThe minimization of risk and uncertainty for both payer and provider is pertinent to the design of a shared savings program. In that respect, the primary care setting provides a number of unique opportunities for achieving cost and quality targets. Accountability can more readily be assumed due to the relatively long-lasting relationships between primary care physicians and patients. A stable population furthermore improves the confidence with which savings can be attributed to changes in population management. Challenges arise from the institutional context. The Dutch health care system has a fragmented structure and providers are typically small in size.

conclusionShared savings programs fit the concept of enhanced primary care. Incorporating a shared savings program into existing payment models could therefore contribute to the financial sustainability of this organizational form.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingCost SavingsDelivery of Health CareHealth Care ReformHealth ExpendituresHealth PersonnelHealth PolicyHumansNetherlandsPhysicians, Primary CarePilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID26715151
PMCPMC4696086
OpenAlexW2203314951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.