Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26715038›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2015

HeLP-Diabetes: randomised controlled trial protocol.

Elizabeth Murray, Charlotte Dack, Maria Barnard, Andrew Farmer, Jinshuo Li, Susan Michie, Kingshuk Pal, Steve Parrott, Jamie Ross, Michael Sweeting and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elizabeth MurrayeHealth Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper Floor 3, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. Elizabeth.murray@ucl.ac.uk.
Charlotte DackPsychology Department, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. c.n.dack@bath.ac.uk.
Maria BarnardThe Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, Magdala Avenue, London, N19 5NF, UK. Maria.barnard1@nhs.net.
Andrew FarmerDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK. Andrew.farmer@phc.ox.ac.uk.
Jinshuo LiDepartment of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. jinshuo.li@york.ac.uk.
Susan MichieUCL Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. s.michie@ucl.ac.uk.
Kingshuk PaleHealth Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper Floor 3, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. k.pal@ucl.ac.uk.
Steve ParrottDepartment of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. steve.parrott@york.ac.uk.
Jamie RosseHealth Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper Floor 3, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. Jamie.Ross@ucl.ac.uk.
Michael SweetingDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort's Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK. mjs212@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Bindie WoodeHealth Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper Floor 3, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. Bindietherealme@hotmail.com.
Lucy YardleyCentre for Application of Health Psychology, University of Southampton, Building 44, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. L.Yardley@soton.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/08/014/24067Department of Health RP-PG-0609-10135Medical Research Council MR/L003120/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is common, affecting nearly 400 million people worldwide. Achieving good health for people with T2DM requires active self-management; however, uptake of self-management education is poor, and there is an urgent need to find better, more acceptable, cost-effective methods of providing self-management support. Web-based self-management support has many potential benefits for patients and health services. The aim of this trial is to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a web-based self-management support programme for people with T2DM.

methodsThis will be a multi-centre individually randomised controlled trial in primary care, recruiting adults with T2DM who are registered with participating general practices in England. Participants will be randomised to receive either an evidence-based, theoretically informed, web-based self-management programme for people with T2DM which addresses medical, emotional, and role management, called Healthy Living for People with type 2 Diabetes (HeLP-Diabetes) or a simple information website. The joint primary outcomes are glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and diabetes-related distress, measured by the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular risk factors, depression and anxiety, and self-efficacy for self-management of diabetes. Health economic data include health service use, costs due to the intervention, and EQ-5D for calculation of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYS). Data will be collected at baseline, 3 months and 12 months, with the primary endpoint at 12 months. Practice nurses, blinded to patient allocation, collect clinical data; patients complete online questionnaires for patient reported measures. A sample size of 350 recruited participants allows for attrition of up to 15 % and will provide 90 % power of detecting at a 5 % significance level a true average difference in the PAID score of 4.0 and 0.25 % change in HbA1c (both small effect sizes). The analysis will follow a pre-specified analysis plan, based on comparing the groups as randomised (intention-to-treat). DISCUSSION: The findings of this trial are likely to be of interest to policy makers, clinicians, and commissioners, all of whom are actively seeking additional forms of self-management support for people with T2DM.

trial registrationThe Trial Registration number is ISRCTN 02123133 ; date of registration 14.2.13.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnxietyCost-Benefit AnalysisDepressionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesEnglandEvidence-Based MedicineGlycated HemoglobinHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID26715038
PMCPMC4696337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.