Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26715037›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Fitness cost in field and laboratory Aedes aegypti populations associated with resistance to the insecticide temephos.

Diego Felipe Araujo Diniz, Maria Alice Varjal de Melo-Santos, Eloína Maria de Mendonça Santos, Eduardo Barbosa Beserra, Elisama Helvecio, Danilo de Carvalho-Leandro, Bianka Santana dos Santos, Vera Lúcia de Menezes Lima, Constância Flávia Junqueira Ayres

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. AGenes · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A comparative analysis ofCurrent research in insect science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Diego Felipe Araujo DinizDepartment of Entomology, Aggeu Magalhães Research Center (Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães - CPqAM) - Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz), Recife, Brazil. didiegofelipe@gmail.com.
Maria Alice Varjal de Melo-SantosDepartment of Entomology, Aggeu Magalhães Research Center (Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães - CPqAM) - Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz), Recife, Brazil. mavarjal@cpqam.fiocruz.br.
Eloína Maria de Mendonça SantosDepartment of Entomology, Aggeu Magalhães Research Center (Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães - CPqAM) - Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz), Recife, Brazil. eloina.santos@gmail.com.
Eduardo Barbosa BeserraDepartment of Biology, State University of Paraíba (Universidade Estadual da Paraíba - UEPB), Campina Grande, Brazil. ebarbosa@uepb.edu.br.
Elisama HelvecioDepartment of Entomology, Aggeu Magalhães Research Center (Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães - CPqAM) - Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz), Recife, Brazil. elisama_helvecio@hotmail.com.
Danilo de Carvalho-LeandroDepartment of Entomology, Aggeu Magalhães Research Center (Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães - CPqAM) - Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz), Recife, Brazil. danilo@cpqam.fiocruz.br.
Bianka Santana dos SantosLaboratory of Lipids, Biochemistry Department, Federal University of Pernambuco (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE), Recife, Brazil. biankasantana@hotmail.com.
Vera Lúcia de Menezes LimaLaboratory of Lipids, Biochemistry Department, Federal University of Pernambuco (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE), Recife, Brazil. vlml@ufpe.br.
Constância Flávia Junqueira AyresDepartment of Entomology, Aggeu Magalhães Research Center (Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães - CPqAM) - Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz), Recife, Brazil. tans@cpqam.fiocruz.br.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Estadual da Paraíba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe continued use of chemical insecticides in the context of the National Program of Dengue Control in Brazil has generated a high selective pressure on the natural populations of Aedes aegypti, leading to their resistance to these compounds in the field. Fitness costs have been described as adaptive consequences of resistance. This study evaluated the biological and reproductive performance of A. aegypti strains and a field population resistant to temephos, the main larvicide used for controlling mosquitoes.

methodsComparative tests were performed with a resistant field population from the municipality of Arcoverde, Pernambuco State, Brazil, with a high rate of temephos resistance (RR = 226.6) and three isogenetic laboratory strains from the same origin (Araripina municipality, Pernambuco): RecR (RR = 283.6); RecRNEx (RR = 250.5), a strain under a process of resistance reversion; and RecRev (RR = 2.32), a reversed susceptible strain used as an experimental control.

resultsOur study revealed that the absence of selective pressure imposed by exposure to temephos, for five consecutive generations, led to a discrete reduction of the resistance ratio and the response of the detoxifying enzymes. Most of the 19 biological parameters were impaired in the resistant strains and field population. The analysis of the fertility life table confirmed the presence of reproductive disadvantages for the resistant individuals. Similarly, the longevity, body size, and total energetic resources were also lower for the resistant females, except for the last two parameters in the field females (Arcoverde). In contrast, the sex ratio and embryonic viability suffered no interference in all strains or population evaluated, regardless of their status of resistance to temephos.

conclusionsThe reproductive potential and survival of the resistant individuals were compromised. The parameters most affected were the larval development time, fecundity, net reproduction rate, and the generational doubling time. These fitness costs in the natural population and laboratory strains investigated are likely associated with maintaining the metabolic mechanism of resistance to temephos. Our results show that despite these costs, the highly temephos resistant populations can compensate for these losses and successfully overcome the control actions that are based on the use of chemical insecticides.

Indexed as

Insecticide ResistanceAedesAnimalsBody SizeBrazilFertilityInsecticidesLongevityReproductionSelection, GeneticSurvival AnalysisTemefosInsecticidesTemefos

Identifiers

PMID26715037
PMCPMC4696322
OpenAlexW2216528029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.