Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26714965›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2016

Update on Difficult Polypectomy Techniques.

Saowanee Ngamruengphong, Heiko Pohl, Yamile Haito-Chavez, Mouen A Khashab

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Histological outcomes between hot and cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saowanee NgamruengphongDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1800 Orleans Street, Zayed Bldg, Suite 7125B, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Heiko PohlDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Yamile Haito-ChavezDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1800 Orleans Street, Zayed Bldg, Suite 7125B, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Mouen A KhashabDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1800 Orleans Street, Zayed Bldg, Suite 7125B, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. mkhasha1@jhmi.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopists often encounter colon polyps that are technically difficult to resect. These lesions traditionally were managed surgically, with significant potential morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in endoscopic techniques and instruments have allowed endoscopists to safely and effectively remove colorectal lesions with high technical and clinical success and potentially avoid invasive surgery. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has gained acceptance as the first-line therapy for large colorectal lesions. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been reported to be associated with higher rate of en bloc resection and less risk of short-time recurrence, but with an increased risk of adverse events. Therefore, the role of colorectal ESD should be restricted to lesions with high-risk morphologic features of submucosal invasion. In this article, we review the recent literature on the endoscopic management of difficult colorectal neoplasms.

Indexed as

AdenomaColonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDissectionElectrocoagulationHumansLymphatic MetastasisRisk FactorsAdenomaColonic polypsColonoscopyEndoscopic resectionPolypectomy

Identifiers

PMID26714965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.