Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26714767›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2015

Physiological and transcriptional analyses of developmental stages along sugarcane leaf.

Lucia Mattiello, Diego Mauricio Riaño-Pachón, Marina Camara Mattos Martins, Larissa Prado da Cruz, Denis Bassi, Paulo Eduardo Ribeiro Marchiori, Rafael Vasconcelos Ribeiro, Mônica T Veneziano Labate, Carlos Alberto Labate, Marcelo Menossi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lucia MattielloLaboratório Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia do Bioetanol (CTBE), Centro Nacional de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais (CNPEM), Caixa Postal 6192, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil. lucia@lgf.ib.unicamp.br.
Diego Mauricio Riaño-PachónLaboratório Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia do Bioetanol (CTBE), Centro Nacional de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais (CNPEM), Caixa Postal 6192, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil. diego.riano@bioetanol.org.br.
Marina Camara Mattos MartinsLaboratório Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia do Bioetanol (CTBE), Centro Nacional de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais (CNPEM), Caixa Postal 6192, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil. marina.martins@bioetanol.org.br.
Larissa Prado da CruzLaboratório Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia do Bioetanol (CTBE), Centro Nacional de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais (CNPEM), Caixa Postal 6192, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil. larissa.cruz@bioetanol.org.br.
Denis BassiLaboratório Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia do Bioetanol (CTBE), Centro Nacional de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais (CNPEM), Caixa Postal 6192, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil. denis.bassi@bioetanol.org.br.
Paulo Eduardo Ribeiro MarchioriLaboratório de Fisiologia de Plantas "Coaracy M. Franco", Centro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Ecofisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto Agronômico, Caixa Postal 28, Campinas, 13020-902, SP, Brazil. marchiori.paulo@gmail.com.
Rafael Vasconcelos RibeiroDepartamento de Biologia de Plantas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Caixa Postal 6109, Campinas, 13083-970, SP, Brazil. rvr@unicamp.br.
Mônica T Veneziano LabateLaboratório Max Feffer de Genética de Plantas, Departamento de Genética, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 83, Piracicaba, 13400-970, SP, Brazil. mtvlabate@gmail.com.
Carlos Alberto LabateLaboratório Max Feffer de Genética de Plantas, Departamento de Genética, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 83, Piracicaba, 13400-970, SP, Brazil. calabate@usp.br.
Marcelo MenossiLaboratório de Genoma Funcional, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas Campinas, Caixa Postal 6109, Campinas, 13083-862, SP, Brazil. menossi@unicamp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSugarcane is one of the major crops worldwide. It is cultivated in over 100 countries on 22 million ha. The complex genetic architecture and the lack of a complete genomic sequence in sugarcane hamper the adoption of molecular approaches to study its physiology and to develop new varieties. Investments on the development of new sugarcane varieties have been made to maximize sucrose yield, a trait dependent on photosynthetic capacity. However, detailed studies on sugarcane leaves are scarce. In this work, we report the first molecular and physiological characterization of events taking place along a leaf developmental gradient in sugarcane.

resultsPhotosynthetic response to CO2 indicated divergence in photosynthetic capacity based on PEPcase activity, corroborated by activity quantification (both in vivo and in vitro) and distinct levels of carbon discrimination on different segments along leaf length. Additionally, leaf segments had contrasting amount of chlorophyll, nitrogen and sugars. RNA-Seq data indicated a plethora of biochemical pathways differentially expressed along the leaf. Some transcription factors families were enriched on each segment and their putative functions corroborate with the distinct developmental stages. Several genes with higher expression in the middle segment, the one with the highest photosynthetic rates, were identified and their role in sugarcane productivity is discussed. Interestingly, sugarcane leaf segments had a different transcriptional behavior compared to previously published data from maize.

conclusionThis is the first report of leaf developmental analysis in sugarcane. Our data on sugarcane is another source of information for further studies aiming to understand and/or improve C4 photosynthesis. The segments used in this work were distinct in their physiological status allowing deeper molecular analysis. Although limited in some aspects, the comparison to maize indicates that all data acquired on one C4 species cannot always be easily extrapolated to other species. However, our data indicates that some transcriptional factors were segment-specific and the sugarcane leaf undergoes through the process of suberizarion, photosynthesis establishment and senescence.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantMolecular Sequence DataPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsSaccharumSequence Analysis, DNAPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26714767
PMCPMC4696237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.