Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26714747›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

What's in your next-generation sequence data? An exploration of unmapped DNA and RNA sequence reads from the bovine reference individual.

Lynsey K Whitacre, Polyana C Tizioto, JaeWoo Kim, Tad S Sonstegard, Steven G Schroeder, Leeson J Alexander, Juan F Medrano, Robert D Schnabel, Jeremy F Taylor, Jared E Decker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novel functional sequences uncovered through a bovine multiassembly graph.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lynsey K WhitacreInformatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. lwhitacre@mail.missouri.edu.
Polyana C TiziotoDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. polytizioto@yahoo.com.br.
JaeWoo KimDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. kijae@missouri.edu.
Tad S SonstegardAnimal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA. tad.sonstegard@ars.usda.gov.
Steven G SchroederAnimal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA. steven.schroeder@ars.usda.gov.
Leeson J AlexanderUSDA-ARS (retired), LARRL, Fort Keogh Miles City, Montana, 59301, USA.
Juan F MedranoDepartment of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. jfmedrano@ucdavis.edu.
Robert D SchnabelInformatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. schnabelr@missouri.edu.
Jeremy F TaylorDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. taylorjerr@missouri.edu.
Jared E DeckerInformatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. DeckerJE@missouri.edu.
University of Missouri · USAgricultural Research Service · USBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRMiles College · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNext-generation sequencing projects commonly commence by aligning reads to a reference genome assembly. While improvements in alignment algorithms and computational hardware have greatly enhanced the efficiency and accuracy of alignments, a significant percentage of reads often remain unmapped.

resultsWe generated de novo assemblies of unmapped reads from the DNA and RNA sequencing of the Bos taurus reference individual and identified the closest matching sequence to each contig by alignment to the NCBI non-redundant nucleotide database using BLAST. As expected, many of these contigs represent vertebrate sequence that is absent, incomplete, or misassembled in the UMD3.1 reference assembly. However, numerous additional contigs represent invertebrate species. Most prominent were several species of Spirurid nematodes and a blood-borne parasite, Babesia bigemina. These species are either not present in the US or are not known to infect taurine cattle and the reference animal appears to have been host to unsequenced sister species.

conclusionsWe demonstrate the importance of exploring unmapped reads to ascertain sequences that are either absent or misassembled in the reference assembly and for detecting sequences indicative of parasitic or commensal organisms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsCattleDNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNASequence Analysis, DNADNARNA

Identifiers

PMID26714747
PMCPMC4696311
OpenAlexW2205437326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.