ArticleBMC cancer2015
The treatment patterns, efficacy, and safety of nab (®)-paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in the United States: results from health insurance claims analysis.
Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Phase II trail of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients with visceral metastases.BMC cancer · 2021Trial
- Identifying the Initiation of a New Line of Therapy for Metastatic Lung, Breast, and Colorectal Cancer in Real-World Data: A Scoping Review.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Considerations for emulations of randomized controlled trials using real-world data: learnings from an emulation of MONALEESA-2.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Article
- The efficacy and therapy management of nab-paclitaxel in the real-world setting for patients with advanced breast cancer - the SERAPHINA study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Observational
- Time to next treatment to evaluate the therapeutic sequence after first- or second-line CDK4/6 inhibitors of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer in Italy: a retrospective/prospective observational trial GOIRC-04-2019.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Survival outcomes of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy as first-line in a real-life setting.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A Novel Thermal-driven Self-assembly Method to Prepare Albumin Nanoparticles: Formation Kinetics, Degradation Behavior and Formation Mechanism.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2022Article
- Metronomic Chemotherapy.Cancers · 2021Review
- Article
- Survival, costs, and health care resource use by line of therapy in US Medicare patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a retrospective observational study.Neuro-oncology practice · 2020Article
- Overall survival, costs, and healthcare resource use by line of therapy in Medicare patients with newly diagnosed metastatic urothelial carcinoma.Journal of medical economics · 2019Article
- Patterns of care and outcomes of patients with METAstatic soft tissue SARComa in a real-life setting: the METASARC observational study.BMC medicine · 2017Observational
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundnab-Paclitaxel is an albumin-bound formulation of paclitaxel approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This analysis was designed to characterize the treatment patterns, efficacy, and safety of nab-paclitaxel for MBC treatment using health claims data from US health plans associated with Optum.
methodsWomen aged ≥ 18 years who initiated nab-paclitaxel for MBC treatment from January 1, 2005, to September 30, 2012, and who met eligibility criteria were selected from the Optum Research Database for this analysis. Patients were required to have complete medical coverage and pharmacy benefits, ≥ 6 months of continuous enrollment, and a diagnosis of MBC prior to nab-paclitaxel initiation. The pattern of use for nab-paclitaxel (eg, regimen, schedule, duration, and administration) and claims-captured toxicities were characterized by line of therapy. Overall survival (OS) and time to next therapy or death (TNTD) were described by line of therapy, regimen, and schedule.
resultsOf the 664 nab-paclitaxel patients, 172 (25.9%) received it as first-line therapy, 211 (31.8%) as second-line therapy, and 281 (42.3%) as third-line or later therapy. Overall, the majority of patients received monotherapy (61%) and followed a weekly (71%) rather than an every 3 weeks treatment schedule. nab-Paclitaxel was often (31.7%) combined with targeted therapy (57.5% with bevacizumab and 23.9% with trastuzumab or lapatinib). The median duration of therapy was 128 days (4.2 months). For the overall population, median OS was 17.4 months (22.7, 17.4, and 15.1 months in first-, second-, and third-line or later therapy, respectively). Median TNTD was 6.1 months (7.1, 6.6, and 5.3 months in first-, second-, and third-line or later therapy, respectively). For patients aged ≤ 50 years or with ≥ 3 metastatic sites, median OS was 15.6 months. No new safety signal was identified.
conclusionsIn this US healthcare system, the majority of patients received nab-paclitaxel as second-line or later therapy, monotherapy, and weekly treatment. The efficacy and safety outcomes of nab-paclitaxel observed in this real-world setting appear consistent with those from clinical trial data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.