Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26714468›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

The treatment patterns, efficacy, and safety of nab (®)-paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in the United States: results from health insurance claims analysis.

Caihua Liang, Ling Li, Cindy Duval Fraser, Amy Ko, Deyanira Corzo, Cheryl Enger, Debra Patt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Experimental hematology & oncology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Caihua LiangOptum Epidemiology, 950 Winter Street, Suite 3800, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA. caihua.liang@optum.com.
Ling LiOptum Epidemiology, 950 Winter Street, Suite 3800, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA. ling.li@optum.com.
Cindy Duval FraserCelgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ, 07901, USA. cin.duval@gmail.com.
Amy KoCelgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ, 07901, USA. ako@celgene.com.
Deyanira CorzoCelgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ, 07901, USA. deyacorzo@aol.com.
Cheryl EngerOptum Epidemiology, 315 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Suite 305, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA. cheryl.enger@optum.com.
Debra PattMcKesson Specialty Health/US Oncology, 6204 Balcones, Austin, TX, 78731, USA. debra.patt@usoncology.com.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Switzerland) · CHOptum (United States) · USMcKesson (United States) · USOptimum Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundnab-Paclitaxel is an albumin-bound formulation of paclitaxel approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This analysis was designed to characterize the treatment patterns, efficacy, and safety of nab-paclitaxel for MBC treatment using health claims data from US health plans associated with Optum.

methodsWomen aged ≥ 18 years who initiated nab-paclitaxel for MBC treatment from January 1, 2005, to September 30, 2012, and who met eligibility criteria were selected from the Optum Research Database for this analysis. Patients were required to have complete medical coverage and pharmacy benefits, ≥ 6 months of continuous enrollment, and a diagnosis of MBC prior to nab-paclitaxel initiation. The pattern of use for nab-paclitaxel (eg, regimen, schedule, duration, and administration) and claims-captured toxicities were characterized by line of therapy. Overall survival (OS) and time to next therapy or death (TNTD) were described by line of therapy, regimen, and schedule.

resultsOf the 664 nab-paclitaxel patients, 172 (25.9%) received it as first-line therapy, 211 (31.8%) as second-line therapy, and 281 (42.3%) as third-line or later therapy. Overall, the majority of patients received monotherapy (61%) and followed a weekly (71%) rather than an every 3 weeks treatment schedule. nab-Paclitaxel was often (31.7%) combined with targeted therapy (57.5% with bevacizumab and 23.9% with trastuzumab or lapatinib). The median duration of therapy was 128 days (4.2 months). For the overall population, median OS was 17.4 months (22.7, 17.4, and 15.1 months in first-, second-, and third-line or later therapy, respectively). Median TNTD was 6.1 months (7.1, 6.6, and 5.3 months in first-, second-, and third-line or later therapy, respectively). For patients aged ≤ 50 years or with ≥ 3 metastatic sites, median OS was 15.6 months. No new safety signal was identified.

conclusionsIn this US healthcare system, the majority of patients received nab-paclitaxel as second-line or later therapy, monotherapy, and weekly treatment. The efficacy and safety outcomes of nab-paclitaxel observed in this real-world setting appear consistent with those from clinical trial data.

Indexed as

AlbuminsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBreast NeoplasmsDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInsurance Claim ReviewInsurance, HealthNeoplasm MetastasisPaclitaxelSurvival AnalysisTime-to-TreatmentUnited States130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID26714468
PMCPMC4696215
OpenAlexW2198943042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.