Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26714466›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Selection processes in simple sequence repeats suggest a correlation with their genomic location: insights from a fungal model system.

Paolo Gonthier, Fabiano Sillo, Elisa Lagostina, Angela Roccotelli, Olga Santa Cacciola, Jan Stenlid, Matteo Garbelotto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative Genome Analysis Across 128Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paolo GonthierDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy. paolo.gonthier@unito.it.
Fabiano SilloDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy. fabiano.sillo@unito.it.
Elisa LagostinaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management, University of California at Berkeley, CA, 94720, Berkeley, USA. elisa.lagostina@gmail.com.
Angela RoccotelliDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management, University of California at Berkeley, CA, 94720, Berkeley, USA. aroccotelli@yahoo.it.
Olga Santa CacciolaDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy. olgacacciola@unict.it.
Jan StenlidDepartment of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. Jan.Stenlid@slu.se.
Matteo GarbelottoDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management, University of California at Berkeley, CA, 94720, Berkeley, USA. matteog@berkeley.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdaptive processes shape the evolution of genomes and the diverse functions of different genomic regions are likely to have an impact on the trajectory and outcome of this evolution. The main underlying hypothesis of this study is that the evolution of Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) is correlated with the evolution of the genomic region in which they are located, resulting in differences of motif size, number of repeats, and levels of polymorphisms. These differences should be clearly detectable when analyzing the frequency and type of SSRs within the genome of a species, when studying populations within a species, and when comparing closely related sister taxa. By coupling a genome-wide SSR survey in the genome of the plant pathogenic fungus Heterobasidion irregulare with an analysis of intra- and interspecific variability of 39 SSR markers in five populations of the two sibling species H. irregulare and H. annosum, we investigated mechanisms of evolution of SSRs.

resultsResults showed a clear dominance of trirepeats and a selection against other repeat number, i.e. di- and tetranucleotides, both in regions inside Open Reading Frames (ORFs) and upstream 5' untranslated region (5'UTR). Locus per locus AMOVA showed SSRs both inside ORFs and upstream 5'UTR were more conserved within species compared to SSRs in other genomic regions, suggesting their evolution is constrained by the functions of the regions they are in. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) indicated that even if SSRs inside ORFs were less polymorphic than those in intergenic regions, they were more powerful in differentiating species. These findings indicate SSRs evolution undergoes a directional selection pressure comparable to that of the ORFs they interrupt and to that of regions involved in regulatory functions.

conclusionsOur work linked the variation and the type of SSRs with regions upstream 5'UTR, putatively harbouring regulatory elements, and shows that the evolution of SSRs might be affected by their location in the genome. Additionally, this study provides a first glimpse on a possible molecular basis for fast adaptation to the environment mediated by SSRs.

Indexed as

5' Untranslated RegionsGenome, PlantGenomicsMicrosatellite RepeatsOpen Reading FramesPolymorphism, Genetic5' Untranslated Regions

Identifiers

PMID26714466
PMCPMC4696308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.