Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26714109›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

Coverage and system efficiencies of insecticide-treated nets in Africa from 2000 to 2017.

Samir Bhatt, Daniel J Weiss, Bonnie Mappin, Ursula Dalrymple, Ewan Cameron, Donal Bisanzio, David L Smith, Catherine L Moyes, Andrew J Tatem, Michael Lynch and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mosquito feeding behavior and how it influences residual malaria transmission across Africa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Advances in population-based interventions to control falciparum malaria.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Samir BhattSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Daniel J WeissSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Bonnie MappinSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1205-719X
Ursula DalrympleSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ewan CameronSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Donal BisanzioSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David L SmithSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4367-3849
Catherine L MoyesSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8028-4079
Andrew J TatemFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States.
Michael LynchGlobal Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cristin A FergusGlobal Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joshua YukichCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Global Health Systems and Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, United States.
Adam BennettMalaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Thomas P EiseleCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Global Health Systems and Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, United States.
Jan KolaczinskiStrategy, Investment and Impact Division, The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland.
Richard E CibulskisGlobal Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Simon I HayFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0611-7272
Peter W GethingSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBNational Institutes of Health · USWorld Health Organization · CHTulane University · USGlobal Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria · CHUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Transmission ProjectU19AI089674 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Joaniter Immaculate Nankabirwa · 2010 to 2026
$29.3M
Medical Research Council K00669XMedical Research Council MR/K00669X/1NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089674Wellcome Trust 091835Wellcome Trust 095066World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) for malaria control are widespread but coverage remains inadequate. We developed a Bayesian model using data from 102 national surveys, triangulated against delivery data and distribution reports, to generate year-by-year estimates of four ITN coverage indicators. We explored the impact of two potential 'inefficiencies': uneven net distribution among households and rapid rates of net loss from households. We estimated that, in 2013, 21% (17%-26%) of ITNs were over-allocated and this has worsened over time as overall net provision has increased. We estimated that rates of ITN loss from households are more rapid than previously thought, with 50% lost after 23 (20-28) months. We predict that the current estimate of 920 million additional ITNs required to achieve universal coverage would in reality yield a lower level of coverage (77% population access). By improving efficiency, however, the 920 million ITNs could yield population access as high as 95%.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchAfricaDisease Transmission, InfectiousInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMosquito ControlBayesian compatment modelepidemiologyglobal healthhumanITNLLINMalaria

Identifiers

PMID26714109
PMCPMC4758960
OpenAlexW2265624047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.