ArticleHead & neck2016
The relationship between communicative participation and postlaryngectomy speech outcomes.
Article in Head & neck, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Objective and subjective voice outcomes after total laryngectomy: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Assessing Inpatient Rehabilitation Outcomes for Pediatric Dysphagia with the PEDI-EAT-10.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Review
- Development and evaluation of a new intraoral voice assist device called the voice retriever.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
- MagTrack: A Wearable Tongue Motion Tracking System for Silent Speech Interfaces.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Speaker Adaptation on Articulation and Acoustics for Articulation-to-Speech Synthesis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Feedback and Feedforward Auditory-Motor Processes for Voice and Articulation in Parkinson's Disease.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Resilience: an essential element in head and neck cancer survivorship and quality of life.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Predicting Communicative Participation in Adults Across Communication Disorders.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2021Article
- Surface Electromyography-Based Recognition, Synthesis, and Perception of Prosodic Subvocal Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Communicative Participation and Quality of Life in Pretreatment Oral and Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Article
- Association Between Communicative Participation and Psychosocial Factors in Patients With Voice Disorders.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2020Article
- Achieving Participation-Focused Intervention Through Shared Decision Making: Proposal of an Age- and Disorder-Generic Framework.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2020Article
- Speech and Communicative Participation in Patients With Facial Paralysis.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2018Article
- Role of Psychosocial Factors on Communicative Participation among Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2018Article
- Variables associated with communicative participation in Parkinson's disease and its relationship to measures of health-related quality-of-life.International journal of speech-language pathology · 2017Article
- Variables Associated With Communicative Participation After Head and Neck Cancer.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2016Article
- Prediction of Speech Impairment in Patients Treated for Oral or Oropharyngeal Cancer Using Automatic Speech Analysis.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to examine relationships between communicative participation and postlaryngectomy speech outcomes, including listener-rated speech intelligibility and acceptability, and patient-rated speech acceptability and voice handicap.
methodsThirty-six laryngectomized individuals completed the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) short form and the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10). They provided recordings from the Sentence Intelligibility Test (SIT) and a reading passage, and rated their own speech acceptability. Forty-eight inexperienced listeners transcribed the SIT sentences to derive intelligibility scores. Eighteen additional listeners judged the speech acceptability using the rating scales.
resultsListeners judged tracheoesophageal speakers as significantly more intelligible and acceptable than electrolaryngeal speakers (p < .05). Speech acceptability was significantly more acceptable to speakers than listeners (p < .05). Weak, nonsignificant relationships were found between communicative participation and listener-rated outcomes. Stronger, significant relationships were found between communicative participation and self-rated speech acceptability and voice handicap (p < .05).
conclusionPatient-reported communication outcomes are complementary to listener-rated outcomes. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1955-E1961, 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.