Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26713857›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Comparison of Self-Reported and Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity in Older Women.

Eric J Shiroma, Nancy R Cook, JoAnn E Manson, Julie E Buring, Eric B Rimm, I-Min Lee

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eric J ShiromaDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Nancy R CookDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
JoAnn E MansonDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Julie E BuringDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Eric B RimmDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
I-Min LeeDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.

Funding

Women's Health Study: Continued Follow-upR01CA047988 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E., LEE, I-MIN · 1991 to 2014
$28.2M
Training Program in the Epidemiology of CVDT32HL007575 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI BURING, JULIE E., RIDKER, PAUL M. · 1985 to 2019
$5.0M
The Women's Health Study: Infrastructure Support for Continued Cohort Follow-upUM1CA182913 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E., LEE, I-MIN · 2014 to 2018
$4.0M
Use of accelerometry data for patterns of daily activity in older personsZIAAG006020 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI SHIROMA, ERIC · 2009 to 2021
$2.7M
Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Mortality in WomenR01CA154647 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEE, I-MIN · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS CA047988NCI NIH HHS CA154647NCI NIH HHS R01 CA047988NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154647NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182913NHLBI NIH HHS HL007575NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-reported physical activity measures continue to be validated against accelerometers; however, the absence of standardized, accelerometer moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) definitions has made comparisons across studies difficult. Furthermore, recent accelerometer models assess accelerations in three axes, instead of only the vertical axis, but validation studies have yet to take incorporate triaxial data.

methodsParticipants (n = 10 115) from the Women's Health Study wore a hip-worn accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X+) for seven days during waking hours (2011-2014). Women then completed a physical activity questionnaire. We compared self-reported with accelerometer-assessed MVPA, using four established cutpoints for MVPA: three using only vertical axis data (760, 1041 and 1952 counts per minute (cpm)) and one using triaxial data (2690 cpm).

resultsAccording to self-reported physical activity, 66.6% of women met the US federal physical activity guidelines, engaging in ≥150 minutes per week of MVPA. The percent of women who met guidelines varied widely depending on the accelerometer MVPA definition (760 cpm: 50.0%, 1041 cpm: 33.0%, 1952 cpm: 13.4%, and 2690 cpm: 19.3%).

conclusionsTriaxial count data do not substantially reduce the difference between self-reported and accelerometer-assessed MVPA.

Indexed as

AccelerometryMotor ActivitySelf ReportAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMonitoring, Physiologic

Identifiers

PMID26713857
PMCPMC4694656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.