Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26713761›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Bacterial Proliferation: Keep Dividing and Don't Mind the Gap.

Luisa Laureti, Julien Demol, Robert P Fuchs, Vincent Pagès

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The RecBC complex protects single-stranded DNA gaps during lesion bypass.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A gatekeeping function of the replicative polymerase controls pathway choice in the resolution of lesion-stalled replisomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luisa LauretiCancer Research Center of Marseille, Team DNA Damage Tolerance, CNRS, UMR7258; Inserm, U1068; Institut Paoli-Calmettes; Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Julien DemolCancer Research Center of Marseille, Team DNA Damage Tolerance, CNRS, UMR7258; Inserm, U1068; Institut Paoli-Calmettes; Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Robert P FuchsCancer Research Center of Marseille, Team DNA Damage Tolerance, CNRS, UMR7258; Inserm, U1068; Institut Paoli-Calmettes; Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Vincent PagèsCancer Research Center of Marseille, Team DNA Damage Tolerance, CNRS, UMR7258; Inserm, U1068; Institut Paoli-Calmettes; Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA Damage Tolerance (DDT) mechanisms help dealing with unrepaired DNA lesions that block replication and challenge genome integrity. Previous in vitro studies showed that the bacterial replicase is able to re-prime downstream of a DNA lesion, leaving behind a single-stranded DNA gap. The question remains of what happens to this gap in vivo. Following the insertion of a single lesion in the chromosome of a living cell, we showed that this gap is mostly filled in by Homology Directed Gap Repair in a RecA dependent manner. When cells fail to repair this gap, or when homologous recombination is impaired, cells are still able to divide, leading to the loss of the damaged chromatid, suggesting that bacteria lack a stringent cell division checkpoint mechanism. Hence, at the expense of losing one chromatid, cell survival and proliferation are ensured.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionDNA Breaks, Single-StrandedRecombinational DNA RepairDNA DamageEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsRec A RecombinasesEscherichia coli ProteinsRec A Recombinases

Identifiers

PMID26713761
PMCPMC4699847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.