Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26713757›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Association of Common Variants in LOX with Keratoconus: A Meta-Analysis.

Jing Zhang, Lu Zhang, Jiaxu Hong, Dan Wu, Jianjiang Xu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic disruption of zebrafish mab21l1 reveals a conserved role in eye development and affected pathways.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Corneal injury: Clinical and molecular aspects.Experimental eye research · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. TSC1 Mutations in Keratoconus Patients With or Without Tuberous Sclerosis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2017
    Article
  16. Genetics in Keratoconus: where are we?Eye and vision (London, England) · 2016
    Review
  17. Screening for NovelJournal of ophthalmic & vision research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing ZhangResearch Center, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Key Laboratory of myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China.
Lu ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jiaxu HongDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Key Laboratory of myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China.
Dan WuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Key Laboratory of myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China.
Jianjiang XuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Key Laboratory of myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral case-control studies have been performed to examine the association of genetic variants in lysyl oxidase (LOX) with keratoconus. However, the results remained inconclusive and great heterogeneity might exist across populations.

methodA comprehensive literature search for studies that published up to June 25, 2015 was performed. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) were estimated with fixed effects model when I2<50% in the test for heterogeneity or random effects model when I2>50%. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test.

resultsA total of four studies including 1,467 keratoconus cases and 4,490 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. SNPs rs2956540 and rs10519694 showed significant association with keratoconus, with ORs of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63-0.80, P = 1.43E-08) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.61-0.97, P = 0.026), respectively. In contrast, our study lacked sufficient evidences to support the association of rs1800449/rs2288393 with keratoconus across populations.

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggested that two LOX variants, rs2956540 and rs10519694, may affect individual susceptibility to keratoconus, while distinct heterogeneity existed within this locus. Larger-scale and multi-ethnic genetic studies on keratoconus are required to further validate the results.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansKeratoconusProtein-Lysine 6-OxidaseProtein-Lysine 6-Oxidase

Identifiers

PMID26713757
PMCPMC4699887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.