Observational studyPloS one2015
Sex Differences in the Quality of Diabetes Care in the Netherlands (ZODIAC-45).
Observational study in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of the Proactive interdisciplinary self-management (PRISMA) program on self-reported and clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.BMC endocrine disorders · 2019Trial
- Sex disparities in medication prescribing amongst patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus managed in primary care.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2023Article
- Self-care and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): a literature review in sex-related differences.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Review
- Less Timely Initiation of Glucose-Lowering Medication Among Younger and Male Patients With Diabetes and Similar Initiation of Blood Pressure-Lowering Medication Across Age and Sex: Trends Between 2015 and 2020.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Article
- Observational
- Sex-related differences in self-care behaviors of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Endocrine · 2020Article
- Costs of people with diabetes in relation to average glucose control: an empirical approach controlling for year of onset cohorts.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019Observational
- Association between full monitoring of biomedical and lifestyle target indicators and HbABMJ open · 2019Observational
- Is guideline-adherent prescribing associated with quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes?PloS one · 2018Article
- Sex differences in obesity related cancer incidence in relation to type 2 diabetes diagnosis (ZODIAC-49).PloS one · 2018Article
- Lifestyle and emotional well-being in men and women with type 2 diabetes (e-VitaDM-4; ZODIAC-48).The European journal of general practice · 2017Article
- Sex differences in survival of patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care (ZODIAC-50).BMJ open · 2017Observational
- Patient Activation in Type 2 Diabetes: Does It Differ between Men and Women?Journal of diabetes researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOur aim was to investigate whether trends in quality of diabetes care differ between sexes in the Netherlands from 1998 till 2013. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsIn this prospective observational cohort study quality of care was measured using process and outcome measures in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care. Trend and absolute differences between sexes were investigated for patients <75 years. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients ≥75 years. 10-year mortality risk was assessed with the Globorisk risk equation in patients without cardiovascular diseases <75 years.
resultsThe number of patients increased from 2,644 in 1998 to 62,230 in 2013. In 1998, 51% of the men and 60% of the women <75 years had an HbA1c >53 mmol/mol; this decreased to approximately 29% in both sexes in 2013. Patients having a systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg decreased from 70% to 42%, and from 80% to 40% in men and women <75 years, respectively. In patients ≥75 years it decreased from 72% to 50% in men and 85% to 56% in women. Obesity increased in both sexes, whereas smoking in men and women declined in patients <75 years (men: 34% to 22%; women: 22% to 18%). The number of patients with a mortality risk >20% over 10 years decreased from 15% to 3% in men and from 18% to 3% in women.
conclusionsQuality of diabetes care has improved considerably in the period 1998-2013 in both sexes. Possibly relevant trend differences between sexes were observed for HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, BMI and smoking. The predicted mortality risk decreased over time in both sexes. Except for BMI in both age groups and systolic blood pressure in patients ≥75 years, no evident poorer risk factor control in women compared to men was found at the end of the study period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.