Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26713444›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2015

Sex Differences in the Quality of Diabetes Care in the Netherlands (ZODIAC-45).

Steven H Hendriks, Kornelis J J van Hateren, Klaas H Groenier, Sebastiaan T Houweling, Angela H E M Maas, Nanne Kleefstra, Henk J G Bilo

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Costs of people with diabetes in relation to average glucose control: an empirical approach controlling for year of onset cohorts.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Steven H HendriksDiabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Kornelis J J van HaterenDiabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Klaas H GroenierDepartment of General Practice, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Sebastiaan T HouwelingDiabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Angela H E M MaasDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Nanne KleefstraDiabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Henk J G BiloDiabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Isala · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur aim was to investigate whether trends in quality of diabetes care differ between sexes in the Netherlands from 1998 till 2013. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsIn this prospective observational cohort study quality of care was measured using process and outcome measures in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care. Trend and absolute differences between sexes were investigated for patients <75 years. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients ≥75 years. 10-year mortality risk was assessed with the Globorisk risk equation in patients without cardiovascular diseases <75 years.

resultsThe number of patients increased from 2,644 in 1998 to 62,230 in 2013. In 1998, 51% of the men and 60% of the women <75 years had an HbA1c >53 mmol/mol; this decreased to approximately 29% in both sexes in 2013. Patients having a systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg decreased from 70% to 42%, and from 80% to 40% in men and women <75 years, respectively. In patients ≥75 years it decreased from 72% to 50% in men and 85% to 56% in women. Obesity increased in both sexes, whereas smoking in men and women declined in patients <75 years (men: 34% to 22%; women: 22% to 18%). The number of patients with a mortality risk >20% over 10 years decreased from 15% to 3% in men and from 18% to 3% in women.

conclusionsQuality of diabetes care has improved considerably in the period 1998-2013 in both sexes. Possibly relevant trend differences between sexes were observed for HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, BMI and smoking. The predicted mortality risk decreased over time in both sexes. Except for BMI in both age groups and systolic blood pressure in patients ≥75 years, no evident poorer risk factor control in women compared to men was found at the end of the study period.

Indexed as

AgedBlood PressureBody Mass IndexDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleNetherlandsQuality of Health CareSex FactorsSmokingTreatment OutcomeGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26713444
PMCPMC4703132
OpenAlexW2197232693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.