Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26713319›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2015

How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement.

Andreas Habertheuer, Dominik Wiedemann, Alfred Kocher, Guenther Laufer, Prashanth Vallabhajosyula

RetractedAbstract readRetracted PublicationReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas HabertheuerDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA ; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Dominik WiedemannDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Alfred KocherDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Guenther LauferDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Prashanth VallabhajosyulaDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arch surgery remains undoubtedly among the most technically and strategically challenging endeavors in cardiovascular surgery. Surgical interventions of thoracic aneurysms involving the aortic arch require complete circulatory arrest in deep hypothermia (DHCA) or elaborate cerebral perfusion strategies with varying degrees of hypothermia to achieve satisfactory protection of the brain from ischemic insults, that is, unilateral/bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) and retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP). Despite sophisticated and increasingly individualized surgical approaches for complex aortic pathologies, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal method of cerebral protection and circulatory management during the time of arch exclusion. Many recent studies argue in favor of ACP with various degrees of hypothermic arrest during arch reconstruction and its advantages have been widely demonstrated. In fact ACP with more moderate degrees of hypothermia represents a paradigm shift in the cardiac surgery community and is widely adopted as an emergent strategy; however, many centers continue to report good results using other perfusion strategies. Amidst this important discussion we review currently available surgical strategies of cerebral protection management and compare the results of recent European multicenter and single-center data.

Indexed as

AortaAorta, ThoracicAortic Aneurysm, ThoracicCerebrovascular CirculationCirculatory Arrest, Deep Hypothermia InducedHospital MortalityHumansPerfusionRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26713319
PMCPMC4680049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.