Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26713278›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of methodology2015

Immunodiagnosis of human hydatid disease: Where do we stand?

Bahador Sarkari, Zahra Rezaei

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of methodology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hydatid Disease of the Liver.Visceral medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Expression and production of protoscolex recombinant P29 protein and its serological evaluation for diagnosis of human hydatidosis.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bahador SarkariBahador Sarkari, Basic Sciences in Infectious Diseases Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz 71345-1735, Iran.
Zahra RezaeiBahador Sarkari, Basic Sciences in Infectious Diseases Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz 71345-1735, Iran.
Creative Research Enterprises (United States) · USShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a zoonotic parasitic infection caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus. Diagnosis of CE mainly relies on a combination of serological testing along with imaging approaches. A variety of serological methods, mainly based on hydatid cyst fluid, antigen B (AgB) and antigen 5, have been developed and used for immunodiagnosis of CE, yet their performances are not satisfactory. Although utilizing of recombinant or synthetic antigens, improved the performance of serological tests, it has not applicably overcome the problem of low sensitivity and cross reactivity, seen in the diagnosis of CE. Performances of immunodiagnostic tests based on AgB subunits are promising. The 8 kDa subunit of AgB is the most studied antigen in native, synthetic or recombinant form for diagnosis of CE. From the 5 subunits of AgB, antigen B8/1 and B8/2 provided the highest diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, detecting of specific antibodies of IgG subclasses has improved the efficacy of immunodiagnostic tests. Among the IgG subclasses, both IgG2 and IgG4 are considered as good markers for diagnosis and IgG4 as a suitable marker for follow up of the patients. In this review an overview of immunodiagnostic methods, related antigens and their performances in the diagnosis of CE are given. The paper highlights pitfall and challenges in the serological diagnosis of CE. Moreover, limitation of currently available immunodiagnostic tests and the most recent development in the designing and application of serological assays for diagnosis of CE in human are addressed.

Indexed as

Cystic echinococcosisHydatid cystImmunodiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID26713278
PMCPMC4686415
OpenAlexW2409326826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.