Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26713229›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2015

Biogeographic variation in the microbiome of the ecologically important sponge, Carteriospongia foliascens.

Heidi M Luter, Stefanie Widder, Emmanuelle S Botté, Muhammad Abdul Wahab, Stephen Whalan, Lucas Moitinho-Silva, Torsten Thomas, Nicole S Webster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stability of the Microbiome of the SpongeFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Cyanobacteria-Dominated SpongeFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heidi M LuterNAMRA and the Research Institute for the Environment & Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University , Darwin, Northern Territory , Australia.
Stefanie WidderCUBE, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.
Emmanuelle S BottéAustralian Institute of Marine Science , Townsville, Queensland , Australia.
Muhammad Abdul WahabAustralian Institute of Marine Science , Crawley Western Australia , Australia.
Stephen WhalanMarine Ecology Research Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering,Southern Cross University , Lismore, New South Wales , Australia.
Lucas Moitinho-SilvaCentre for Marine Bio-Innovation and School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences,University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales , Australia.
Torsten ThomasCentre for Marine Bio-Innovation and School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences,University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales , Australia.
Nicole S WebsterAustralian Institute of Marine Science , Townsville, Queensland , Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sponges are well known for hosting dense and diverse microbial communities, but how these associations vary with biogeography and environment is less clear. Here we compared the microbiome of an ecologically important sponge species, Carteriospongia foliascens, over a large geographic area and identified environmental factors likely responsible for driving microbial community differences between inshore and offshore locations using co-occurrence networks (NWs). The microbiome of C. foliascens exhibited exceptionally high microbial richness, with more than 9,000 OTUs identified at 97% sequence similarity. A large biogeographic signal was evident at the OTU level despite similar phyla level diversity being observed across all geographic locations. The C. foliascens bacterial community was primarily comprised of Gammaproteobacteria (34.2% ± 3.4%) and Cyanobacteria (32.2% ± 3.5%), with lower abundances of Alphaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, unidentified Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria. Co-occurrence NWs revealed a consistent increase in the proportion of Cyanobacteria over Bacteroidetes between turbid inshore and oligotrophic offshore locations, suggesting that the specialist microbiome of C. foliascens is driven by environmental factors.

Indexed as

BiogeographyCarteriospongia foliascensCo-occurrence networks (NWs)Sponge-associated microbial community

Identifiers

PMID26713229
PMCPMC4690404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.