Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26713214›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2015

Heartbeat OCT: in vivo intravascular megahertz-optical coherence tomography.

Tianshi Wang, Tom Pfeiffer, Evelyn Regar, Wolfgang Wieser, Heleen van Beusekom, Charles T Lancee, Geert Springeling, Ilona Krabbendam, Antonius F W van der Steen, Robert Huber and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Intravascular optical coherence elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2022
    Article
  13. EndoscopicBiomedical optics express · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. A review of low-cost and portable optical coherence tomography.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tianshi WangThorax Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, P. O. Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands ; These authors contributed equally to this work.
Tom PfeifferLehrstuhl für Biomolekulare Optik, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Oettingenstr. 67, München 80538, Germany ; Institut für Biomedizinische Optik, Universität zu Lübeck, Peter-Monnik-Weg 4, 23562 Lübeck Germany ; These authors contributed equally to this work.
Evelyn RegarThorax Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, P. O. Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands.
Wolfgang WieserLehrstuhl für Biomolekulare Optik, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Oettingenstr. 67, München 80538, Germany.
Heleen van BeusekomThorax Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, P. O. Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands.
Charles T LanceeThorax Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, P. O. Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands.
Geert SpringelingThorax Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, P. O. Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands.
Ilona KrabbendamThorax Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, P. O. Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands.
Antonius F W van der SteenThorax Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, P. O. Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands ; Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 518055 Shenzhen, China ; Department of Imaging science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Postbus 5, Delft 2600 AA, The Netherlands.
Robert HuberLehrstuhl für Biomolekulare Optik, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Oettingenstr. 67, München 80538, Germany ; Institut für Biomedizinische Optik, Universität zu Lübeck, Peter-Monnik-Weg 4, 23562 Lübeck Germany.
Gijs van SoestThorax Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, P. O. Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac motion artifacts, non-uniform rotational distortion and undersampling affect the image quality and the diagnostic impact of intravascular optical coherence tomography (IV-OCT). In this study we demonstrate how these limitations of IV-OCT can be addressed by using an imaging system that we called "Heartbeat OCT", combining a fast Fourier Domain Mode Locked laser, fast pullback, and a micromotor actuated catheter, designed to examine a coronary vessel in less than one cardiac cycle. We acquired in vivo data sets of two coronary arteries in a porcine heart with both Heartbeat OCT, working at 2.88 MHz A-line rate, 4000 frames/s and 100 mm/s pullback speed, and with a commercial system. The in vivo results show that Heartbeat OCT provides faithfully rendered, motion-artifact free, fully sampled vessel wall architecture, unlike the conventional IV-OCT data. We present the Heartbeat OCT system in full technical detail and discuss the steps needed for clinical translation of the technology.

Indexed as

(110.2350) Fiber optics imaging(110.6880) Three-dimensional image acquisition(120.3890) Medical optics instrumentation(120.5800) Scanners(170.2150) Endoscopic imaging(170.3880) Medical and biological imaging(170.4500) Optical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID26713214
PMCPMC4679274
OpenAlexW2174848259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.