Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26713193›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2015

Quantifying Gleason scores with photoacoustic spectral analysis: feasibility study with human tissues.

Guan Xu, Mandy C Davis, Javed Siddiqui, Scott A Tomlins, Shengsong Huang, Lakshmi P Kunju, John T Wei, Xueding Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Diagnosis of prostate cancer by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometric imaging of small metabolites and lipids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guan XuDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Mandy C DavisDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Javed SiddiquiDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Scott A TomlinsDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Shengsong HuangDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Putuo, Shanghai 200065, China.
Lakshmi P KunjuDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
John T WeiDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Xueding WangDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USTongji University · CN

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)UL1TR000433 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$49.9M
Physiology of Inflammatory Arthritis in High ResolutionR01AR060350 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WANG, XUEDING · 2011 to 2021
$6.0M
Photonic Nanosonophores for Functional and Structural ImagingR01CA186769 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KOPELMAN, RAOUL, WANG, XUEDING · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000433NCI NIH HHS R01 CA186769NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR060350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gleason score is a highly prognostic factor for prostate cancer describing the microscopic architecture of the tumor tissue. The standard procedure for evaluating Gleason scores, namely biopsy, is to remove prostate tissue for observation under microscope. Currently, biopsies are guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Due to the low sensitivity of TRUS to prostate cancer (PCa), non-guided and saturated biopsies are frequently employed, unavoidably causing pain, damage to the normal prostate tissues and other complications. More importantly, due to the limited number of biopsy cores, current procedure could either miss early stage small tumors or undersample aggressive cancers. Photoacoustic (PA) measurement has the unique capability of evaluating tissue microscopic architecture information at ultrasonic resolution. By frequency domain analysis of the broadband PA signal, namely PA spectral analysis (PASA), the microscopic architecture within the assessed tissue can be quantified. This study investigates the feasibility of evaluating Gleason scores by PASA. Simulations with the classic Gleason patterns and experiment measurements from human PCa tissues have demonstrated strong correlation between the PASA parameters and the Gleason scores.

Indexed as

(110.5125) Photoacoustics(120.3890) Medical optics instrumentation(170.6510) Spectroscopy, tissue diagnostics(170.6935) Tissue characterization

Identifiers

PMID26713193
PMCPMC4679253
OpenAlexW2253683464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.