Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26713052›Full record

Observational studyJournal of Korean medical science2015

Comparison of HE4, CA125, and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm in the Prediction of Ovarian Cancer in Korean Women.

Hye Yon Cho, Sung Ho Park, Young Han Park, Hong Bae Kim, Jung Bae Kang, Seung Hwa Hong, Min Sun Kyung

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of Korean medical science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Exhausted and Senescent CD4Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hye Yon ChoDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Hallym University Medical Center, Hwaseong, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5697-8118
Sung Ho ParkDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Hallym University Medical Center, Hwaseong, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2171-235X
Young Han ParkDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Hallym University Medical Center, Hwaseong, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5114-4763
Hong Bae KimDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Hallym University Medical Center, Hwaseong, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3720-1127
Jung Bae KangDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Hallym University Medical Center, Hwaseong, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6989-6138
Seung Hwa HongDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8118-745X
Min Sun KyungDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Hallym University Medical Center, Hwaseong, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5279-4584
Hallym University Medical Center · KRChungbuk National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is a multi-center clinical study, which aimed to compare CA125, HE4, and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in predicting epithelial ovarian cancer of Korean women with a pelvic mass. Prospectively, serum from 90 Korean women with ovarian mass was obtained prior to surgery. For control group, serum from 79 normal populations without ovarian mass was also obtained. The HE4 and CA125 data were registered and evaluated separately and ROMA was calculated for each sample. Total 67 benign tumors and 23 ovarian cancers were evaluated. Median serum levels of HE4 and CA125, and ROMA score were significantly higher in patients with ovarian cancer than those with benign ovarian tumor and normal population (P < 0.001). In ROC curve analysis for women with a pelvic mass, area under the curve (AUC) for HE4 and ROMA was higher than CA125. Statistical differences in each study compared to CA125 were marginal (P compared to CA125; 0.082 for HE4 and 0.069 for ROMA). Sub-analysis revealed that AUC for HE4 and ROMA was higher than AUC for CA125 in post-menopausal women with a pelvic mass, but there were no statistically significant differences (P compared to CA125; 0.160 for HE4 and 0.127 for ROMA). Our data suggested that both HE4 and ROMA score showed better performance than CA125 for the detection of ovarian cancer in women with a pelvic mass. HE4 and ROMA can be a useful independent diagnostic marker for epithelial ovarian cancer in Korean women.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesProteinsReference ValuesRepublic of KoreaBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenProteinsWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2WFDC2 protein, humanCA125 AntigenHE4Ovarian NeoplasmsROMATumor Markers, Biological

Identifiers

PMID26713052
PMCPMC4689821
OpenAlexW2203448524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.