Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26712620›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2016

Antibacterial effects of quaternary bis-phosphonium and ammonium salts of pyridoxine on Staphylococcus aureus cells: A single base hitting two distinct targets?

Elena V Nikitina, Marina I Zeldi, Mikhail V Pugachev, Sergey V Sapozhnikov, Nikita V Shtyrlin, Svetlana V Kuznetsova, Vladimir E Evtygin, Mikhail I Bogachev, Airat R Kayumov, Yurii G Shtyrlin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elena V NikitinaKazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia, 420008. ev-nikitina@inbox.ru.
Marina I ZeldiKazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia, 420008.
Mikhail V PugachevKazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia, 420008.
Sergey V SapozhnikovKazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia, 420008.
Nikita V ShtyrlinKazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia, 420008.
Svetlana V KuznetsovaKazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia, 420008.
Vladimir E EvtyginKazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia, 420008.
Mikhail I BogachevBiomedical Engineering Research Center, St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University, St. Petersburg, Russia, 197376.
Airat R KayumovKazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia, 420008.
Yurii G ShtyrlinKazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia, 420008.
Kazan Federal University · RUSaint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied the effects of quaternary bis-phosphonium and bis-ammonium salts of pyridoxine with lipophilic substituents on the survival and morphology of Staphylococcus aureus cells. We found that, while originating from the same base, they exhibit considerably different antimicrobial mechanisms. In the presence of Ca(2+) ions the MIC and MBC values of ammonium salt increased 100-fold, suggesting that Ca(2+) ions can successfully impede the membrane Ca(2+) ions exchange required for ammonium salt incorporation. In contrast, in the presence of quaternary phosphonium salt, the artificial capsular-like material was formed around the cells and the filamentous and chain-like growth of the cells was observed suggesting the disruption of the cell division mechanisms. Altogether, both pyridoxine derivatives successfully inhibited the growth of gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Bacillus subtilis) and Escherichia coli considerably, while demonstrated nearly no effect against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We suggest that due to their effects on distinct and likely complementary targets the derivatives of pyridoxine represent potentially perspective antibacterials with complicated adaptation and thus with lower risk of drug resistance development.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicroscopy, FluorescenceOrganophosphorus CompoundsPyridoxineQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsOrganophosphorus CompoundsPyridoxineQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsAntibacterial activityFluorescent microscopyPyridoxineQuaternary ammonium saltsQuaternary phosphonium salts

Identifiers

PMID26712620
OpenAlexW2462680829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.