ReviewMolecular neurobiology2017
Understanding Ependymoma Oncogenesis: an Update on Recent Molecular Advances and Current Perspectives.
Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review
- Intracranial ependymomas: molecular insights and translation to treatment.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Tumor-infiltrating immune cell subpopulations and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression associated with clinicopathological and prognostic parameters in ependymoma.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2019Article
- Supratentorial "vascular" variant of ependymoma: a lesser known morphologic variant and a diagnostic pitfall.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016Article
- Prognostic Implications of Histological Clear Cells in High-Grade Intracranial Ependymal Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan.Asian journal of neurosurgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remarkable progress has been made in the last decade in understanding the biology and oncogenesis of this relatively rare childhood brain tumor-the ependymoma. Surgery and irradiation are the mainstays of therapeutic options; chemotherapy is yet to predictably affect outcome, and its role is currently being explored in several clinical trials. While WHO scores this tumor into three grades, grading of ependymoma into grade II and grade III is controversial because of its elusive histological criteria where no cut-offs have been defined for mitoses or percentage of tumor depicting increased cellularity. Grading remains unreliable in predicting outcome in several instances. There is a compelling need to integrate the molecular biomarkers highlighted in several studies over the past decade into patient risk stratification to help in better predicting the clinical outcome and to design effective tailored therapy. Genomic and transcriptomic studies lately have defined distinct molecular subgroups within ependymoma arising at three anatomic compartments-supratentorial, posterior fossa, and spinal cord. Review of pertinent literature on several seminal studies that have established a paradigm shift in understanding the oncogenesis of ependymoma has been carried out. The outcome, impact, and clinical relevance of these studies are also discussed. The review provides an update on progress and recent advances in understanding the biology and oncogenesis of ependymoma. The establishment of robust subgroups which are demographically, clinically, and molecularly distinct will provide new avenues for further refinement of therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26712502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.