Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26712495›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2016

Impact of the Surgical Experience on Leak Rate After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Patrick Noel, Marius Nedelcu, Michel Gagner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Early major complications after bariatric surgery in the USA, 2003-2014: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Endoscopic vacuum therapy.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick NoelHôpital Prive La Casamance, Aubagne, France.
Marius NedelcuDigestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France. nedelcu.marius@gmail.com.
Michel GagnerHôpital Du Sacré Cœur, Montréal, Canada.
Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg · FRHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CAHôpital Privé Jacques Cartier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures, largely due to several advantages it carries over more complex bariatric procedures. LSG is generally considered a straightforward procedure, but one of the major concerns is a staple line leak.

objectiveThe objectives of this study are to evaluate the correlation between surgeon's experience and leak rate and to assess the different risk factors for developing a gastric leak after LSG.

settingPrivate hospital, France.

methodsThe analysis of a single surgeon's yearly leak rate since the introduction of LSG for possible risk factors was done.

resultsA total of 2012 LSGs were performed in between September, 2005 and December, 2014. Twenty cases (1 %) of gastric leak were recorded. Of these, 17 patients were women (94.4 %) with a mean age of 39.4 years (range 22-61) and mean body mass index (BMI) 41.2 kg/m(2) (range 34.8-57.1). On a yearly basis, the leak rate was 4.8 % (2006), 5.7 % (2007), 0 (2008), 2.6 % (2009), 2 % (2010), 0.8 % (2011), 0.6 % (2012), 0.2 % (2013), and 0 (2014). In the first 1000 cases (group A), there were 18 cases of gastric leak and in the last 1000 cases, there were 800 with GORE® SEAMGUARD® Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement (group B) 2 cases of gastric leak (p = 0.009). A revisional LSG, 395 patients after gastric banding and 61 patients re-sleeve gastrectomy, was performed in 456 cases (22.7 %). There were 3 cases of leak (0.65 %). There were two deaths.

conclusionLSG can be performed with a low complication rate. This large series of a single surgeon's experience demonstrated that the leak rate after LSG could be significantly decreased over time with changes in techniques.

Indexed as

AdultAnastomotic LeakBody Mass IndexFemaleFranceGastrectomyHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsSurgical StaplingWeight LossYoung AdultLeakRevisional surgerySleeveSurgeon’s experience

Identifiers

PMID26712495
OpenAlexW2211328856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.