Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26712329›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2016

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic function: from ejection fraction to torsion.

Matteo Cameli, Sergio Mondillo, Marco Solari, Francesca Maria Righini, Valentina Andrei, Carla Contaldi, Eugenia De Marco, Michele Di Mauro, Roberta Esposito, Sabina Gallina and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ultrasound innovations in diaphragm assessment: an integrative review of expanding clinical applications.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo CameliCardiology Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Bracci No 1, 53100, Siena, Italy. cameli@cheapnet.it.
Sergio MondilloCardiology Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Bracci No 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Marco SolariCardiology Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Bracci No 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Francesca Maria RighiniCardiology Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Bracci No 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Valentina AndreiCardiology Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Bracci No 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Carla ContaldiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Cardiovascular & Immunological Sciences, Federico II University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy.
Eugenia De MarcoCardiology Department, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Michele Di MauroDepartment of Cardiology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Roberta EspositoDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Sabina GallinaDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Roberta MontisciDepartment of Cardiovascular and Neurological Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Andrea RossiSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Maurizio GalderisiDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Stefano NistriCardiology Service, CMSR-Veneto Medica, Altavilla Vicentina, VI, Italy.
Eustachio AgricolaDivision of NonInvasive Cardiology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Donato MeleCardiology Unit, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
University of Siena · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITMedica (Italy) · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function is the cornerstone of the echocardiographic examination. There are many echocardiographic parameters that can be used for clinical and research purposes, each one with its pros and cons. The LV ejection fraction is the most used one due to its feasibility and predictability, but it also has many limits, related to both the imaging technique used for calculation and to the definition itself. LV longitudinal function is expression of subendocardial fibers contraction. Because the subendocardium is often involved early in many pathological processes, its analysis has been a fertile field for the development of sensitive parameters. Longitudinal function can be evaluated in many ways, such as M-mode echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging, and speckle tracking echocardiography. This latter is a relatively new tool to assess LV function through measurement of myocardial strain, with a high temporal and spatial resolution and a better inter- and intra-observer reproducibility compared to Doppler strain. It is angle independent, not affected by translation cardiac movements, and can assess simultaneously the entire myocardium along all the three-dimensional geometrical (longitudinal, circumferential, and radial) axes. Speckle tracking echocardiography also allows the analysis of LV torsion. The aim of this paper was to review the main echocardiographic parameters of LV systolic function and to describe its pros and cons.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyHeart DiseasesBlood PressureHumansReproducibility of ResultsStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftEjection fractionSpeckle trackingStrainStroke volumeTorsion

Identifiers

PMID26712329
OpenAlexW2279076616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.