Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26711910›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2016

NMDA receptor antagonism disrupts acquisition and retention of the context preexposure facilitation effect in adolescent rats.

Nicholas A Heroux, Patrese A Robinson-Drummer, Jeffrey B Rosen, Mark E Stanton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas A HerouxDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.
Patrese A Robinson-DrummerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.
Jeffrey B RosenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.
Mark E StantonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States. Electronic address: Stanton@udel.edu.
University of Delaware · US

Funding

Updated confocal microscope in the Imaging Core facility to support biomedical researchP20GM103653 · NIGMS · DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HARRINGTON, MELISSA A · 2012 to 2022
$22.7M
Mechanisms of Context Conditioning in the Developing RatR01HD075066 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI ROSEN, JEFFREY B, STANTON, MARK E. · 2014 to 2016
$863k
NICHD NIH HHS 1-R01-HD075066-01A1NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075066NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The context preexposure facilitation effect (CPFE) is a contextual fear conditioning paradigm in which learning about the context, acquiring the context-shock association, and retrieving/expressing contextual fear are temporally dissociated. The current study investigated the involvement of NMDA receptors in contextual fear acquisition, retention, and expression across all phases of the CPFE in adolescent rats. In Experiment 1 systemic injections of 0.1mg/kg MK-801, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, given before multiple context preexposure disrupted the acquisition of a context representation. In Experiment 2, pre-training MK-801 disrupted both immediate acquisition of contextual fear measured by postshock freezing, as well as retention test freezing 24h later. Experiment 3 showed that expression of contextual fear via a 24h retention freezing test does not depend on NMDA receptors, indicating that MK-801 disrupts learning rather than performance of freezing behavior. In Experiment 4, consolidation of contextual information was partially disrupted by post-preexposure MK-801 whereas consolidation of contextual fear was not disrupted by post-training MK-801. Finally, Experiment 5 employed a dose-response design and found that a pre-training dose of 0.1mg/kg MK-801 disrupted both postshock and retention test freezing while lower pre-training doses of MK-801 (0.025 or 0.05mg/kg) only disrupted retention freezing. This is the first study to distinguish the role of NMDA receptors in acquisition (post-shock freezing), retention, expression, and consolidation of context vs. context-shock learning using the CPFE paradigm in adolescent rats. The findings provide a foundation for similar developmental studies examining these effects from early ontogeny through adulthood.

Indexed as

AnimalsAssociation LearningConditioning, PsychologicalDizocilpine MaleateDose-Response Relationship, DrugElectroshockExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFearFemaleFreezing Reaction, CatalepticMaleMemoryNeuropsychological TestsRandom AllocationRats, Long-EvansReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateDizocilpine MaleateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateCPFEDose-response NMDA receptor involvement in the CPFENMDA receptorsPostshockRetentionSystemic MK-801

Identifiers

PMID26711910
PMCPMC4732717
OpenAlexW2199253819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.