Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26711855›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2016

Ultrafast Spectroscopy with Photocurrent Detection: Watching Excitonic Optoelectronic Systems at Work.

Artem A Bakulin, Carlos Silva, Eleonora Vella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A quantum information processing machine for computing by observables.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. 2D Electronic Spectroscopic Techniques for Quantum Technology Applications.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Artem A BakulinCavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom.
Carlos SilvaDépartement de physique & Regroupement québécois sur les matériaux de pointe, Université de Montréal , C.P. 6128, Succursale centre-ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.
Eleonora VellaDépartement de physique & Regroupement québécois sur les matériaux de pointe, Université de Montréal , C.P. 6128, Succursale centre-ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.

Funding

European Research Council 639750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While ultrafast spectroscopy with photocurrent detection was almost unknown before 2012, in the last 3 years, a number of research groups from different fields have independently developed ultrafast electric probe approaches and reported promising pilot studies. Here, we discuss these recent advances and provide our perspective on how photocurrent detection successfully overcomes many limitations of all-optical methods, which makes it a technique of choice when device photophysics is concerned. We also highlight compelling existing problems and research questions and suggest ways for further development, outlining the potential breakthroughs to be expected in the near future using photocurrent ultrafast optical probes.

Identifiers

PMID26711855
PMCPMC4819534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.