Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26711850›Full record

ReviewBrain research2016

Catecholaminergic based therapies for functional recovery after TBI.

Nicole D Osier, C Edward Dixon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AlphaNeural regeneration research · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biomarkers in traumatic brain injury (TBI): a review.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole D OsierSafar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
C Edward DixonSafar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; V.A. Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA. Electronic address: dixonec@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Targeting Research and Academic Training of Nurses in GenomicsT32NR009759 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CONLEY, YVETTE P · 2006 to 2025
$4.5M
Alpha-Synuclein and Synaptic Vesicle Dysfunction after Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS091062 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DIXON, C EDWARD · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
SNARE Proteins and TBIR01NS079061 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DIXON, C EDWARD · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Mechanism of Melatonin-induced Neuroprotection in Traumatic Brain InjuryF31NR014957 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI OSIER, NICOLE DANIELLE · 2014 to 2015
$86k
Chronic Lithium Therapy for Traumatic Brain InjuryI01RX001127 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI DIXON, C EDWARD · 2014 to 2018
–
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS079061NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091062NINR NIH HHS F31 NR014957NINR NIH HHS T32 NR009759RRD VA I01 RX001127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the many pathophysiologic consequences of traumatic brain injury are changes in catecholamines, including dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine. In the context of TBI, dopamine is the one most extensively studied, though some research exploring epinephrine and norepinephrine have also been published. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence surrounding use of drugs that target the catecholaminergic system on pathophysiological and functional outcomes of TBI using published evidence from pre-clinical and clinical brain injury studies. Evidence of the effects of specific drugs that target catecholamines as agonists or antagonists will be discussed. Taken together, available evidence suggests that therapies targeting the catecholaminergic system may attenuate functional deficits after TBI. Notably, it is fairly common for TBI patients to be treated with catecholamine agonists for either physiological symptoms of TBI (e.g. altered cerebral perfusion pressures) or a co-occuring condition (e.g. shock), or cognitive symptoms (e.g. attentional and arousal deficits). Previous clinical trials are limited by methodological limitations, failure to replicate findings, challenges translating therapies to clinical practice, the complexity or lack of specificity of catecholamine receptors, as well as potentially counfounding effects of personal and genetic factors. Overall, there is a need for additional research evidence, along with a need for systematic dissemination of important study details and results as outlined in the common data elements published by the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke. Ultimately, a better understanding of catecholamines in the context of TBI may lead to therapeutic advancements. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI:Brain injury and recovery.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain Injuries, TraumaticCatecholaminesHumansNeuroprotective AgentsNeurotransmitter AgentsReceptors, CatecholamineRecovery of FunctionCatecholaminesNeuroprotective AgentsNeurotransmitter AgentsReceptors, CatecholamineCatecholamineDopamineEpinephrineNorepinephrineTherapyTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID26711850
PMCPMC4870139
OpenAlexW2219559188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.