Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26711776›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Posttreatment Antifungal Resistance among Colonizing Candida Isolates in Candidemia Patients: Results from a Systematic Multicenter Study.

R H Jensen, H K Johansen, L M Søes, L E Lemming, F S Rosenvinge, L Nielsen, B Olesen, L Kristensen, E Dzajic, K M T Astvad and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Role of liposomal amphotericin B in intensive care unit: an expert opinion paper.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antifungal susceptibility, molecular epidemiology, and clinical risk factors ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Liposomal amphotericin B-the future.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  17. Pan-Echinocandin ResistantJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Diagnosis and Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Antifungal drug resistance: an update.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

R H JensenUnit of Mycology, Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9796-023X
H K JohansenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
L M SøesDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark Department of Clinical Microbiology, Slagelse Sygehus, Slagelse, Denmark.
L E LemmingDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
F S RosenvingeDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Sygehus Lillebælt, Vejle, Denmark Department of Clinical Microbiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
L NielsenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
B OlesenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
L KristensenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Hospitalsenheden Vest, Herning, Denmark Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospitalsenheden Midt, Viborg, Denmark.
E DzajicDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Sydvestjysk Sygehus, Esbjerg, Denmark.
K M T AstvadUnit of Mycology, Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
M C ArendrupUnit of Mycology, Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark maca@ssi.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of intrinsic and acquired resistance among colonizing Candida isolates from patients after candidemia was investigated systematically in a 1-year nationwide study. Patients were treated at the discretion of the treating physician. Oral swabs were obtained after treatment. Species distributions and MIC data were investigated for blood and posttreatment oral isolates from patients exposed to either azoles or echinocandins for <7 or ≥ 7 days. Species identification was confirmed using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing, susceptibility was examined by EUCAST EDef 7.2 methodology, echinocandin resistance was examined by FKS sequencing, and genetic relatedness was examined by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). One hundred ninety-three episodes provided 205 blood and 220 oral isolates. MLST analysis demonstrated a genetic relationship for 90% of all paired blood and oral isolates. Patients exposed to azoles for ≥ 7 days (n = 93) had a significantly larger proportion of species intrinsically less susceptible to azoles (particularly Candida glabrata) among oral isolates than among initial blood isolates (36.6% versus 12.9%; P < 0.001). A similar shift toward species less susceptible to echinocandins among 85 patients exposed to echinocandins for ≥ 7 days was not observed (4.8% of oral isolates versus 3.2% of blood isolates; P > 0.5). Acquired resistance in Candida albicans was rare (<5%). However, acquired resistance to fluconazole (29.4%; P < 0.05) and anidulafungin (21.6%; P < 0.05) was common in C. glabrata isolates from patients exposed to either azoles or echinocandins. Our findings suggest that the colonizing mucosal microbiota may be an unrecognized reservoir of resistant Candida species, especially C. glabrata, following treatment for candidemia. The resistance rates were high, raising concern in general for patients exposed to antifungal drugs.

Indexed as

AgedAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandidemiaDenmarkDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleFluconazoleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultilocus Sequence TypingAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID26711776
PMCPMC4775986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.