Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26711744›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Bacteriophage Can Prevent Encrustation and Blockage of Urinary Catheters by Proteus mirabilis.

Jonathan Nzakizwanayo, Aurélie Hanin, Diana R Alves, Benjamin McCutcheon, Cinzia Dedi, Jonathan Salvage, Karen Knox, Bruce Stewart, Anthony Metcalfe, Jason Clark and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  8. Quick Detection ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan NzakizwanayoSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Aurélie HaninAlimentary Pharmabiotic Centre and School of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Diana R AlvesSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom Blond McIndoe Research Foundation, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, United Kingdom Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, East Grinstead, United Kingdom.
Benjamin McCutcheonSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Cinzia DediSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Jonathan SalvageSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Karen KnoxEast Surrey Hospital, Surrey and Sussex NHS Healthcare Trust, Redhill, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Bruce StewartEast Surrey Hospital, Surrey and Sussex NHS Healthcare Trust, Redhill, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Anthony MetcalfeSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom Blond McIndoe Research Foundation, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, United Kingdom.
Jason ClarkNovolytics Ltd., Daresbury Science and Innovation Campus, Warrington, United Kingdom.
Brendan F GilmoreSchool of Pharmacy, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Cormac G M GahanAlimentary Pharmabiotic Centre and School of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
A Toby A JenkinsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Brian V JonesSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, East Grinstead, United Kingdom b.v.jones@brighton.ac.uk.
University of Brighton · GBEast Surrey Hospital · GBUniversity College Cork · IEBlond McIndoe Research Foundation · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBSci-Tech Daresbury · GBUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

The Dunhill Medical Trust R394/1114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteus mirabilis forms dense crystalline biofilms on catheter surfaces that occlude urine flow, leading to serious clinical complications in long-term catheterized patients, but there are presently no truly effective approaches to control catheter blockage by this organism. This study evaluated the potential for bacteriophage therapy to control P. mirabilis infection and prevent catheter blockage. Representative in vitro models of the catheterized urinary tract, simulating a complete closed drainage system as used in clinical practice, were employed to evaluate the performance of phage therapy in preventing blockage. Models mimicking either an established infection or early colonization of the catheterized urinary tract were treated with a single dose of a 3-phage cocktail, and the impact on time taken for catheters to block, as well as levels of crystalline biofilm formation, was measured. In models of established infection, phage treatment significantly increased time taken for catheters to block (∼ 3-fold) compared to untreated controls. However, in models simulating early-stage infection, phage treatment eradicated P. mirabilis and prevented blockage entirely. Analysis of catheters from models of established infection 10 h after phage application demonstrated that phage significantly reduced crystalline biofilm formation but did not significantly reduce the level of planktonic cells in the residual bladder urine. Taken together, these results show that bacteriophage constitute a promising strategy for the prevention of catheter blockage but that methods to deliver phage in sufficient numbers and within a key therapeutic window (early infection) will also be important to the successful application of phage to this problem.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesBiofilmsCatheters, IndwellingDrainageHumansMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionModels, BiologicalPhage TherapyProteus InfectionsProteus mirabilisUrinary CatheterizationUrinary Catheters

Identifiers

PMID26711744
PMCPMC4775969
OpenAlexW2216029974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.