ArticleBMC cancer2015
What does satisfaction with wait times mean to cancer patients?
Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Conflicting Guidelines: A Systematic Review on the Proper Interval for Colorectal Cancer Treatment.World journal of surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Patient Satisfaction and Supportive Care Pathways in a German Head and Neck Tumor Center: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Health economic analysis of organizational models for breast cancer surgery: a bottom-up micro-costing and cost-minimization approach.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Developing a Patient Experience Questionnaire for the Man Van Mobile Clinical Unit.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Health systems responsiveness in low and middle-income countries (L&MICs): revisiting its scope.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Twenty years of breast cancer epidemiology and treatment patterns in SLancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
- Fast-Track Diagnostic Pathway for Lung Cancer Detection: Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Optical histopathology based on the nonlabeling analysis with multiphoton excitation imaging.Pathology international · 2025Review
- Rethinking Health Systems Responsiveness in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Validation Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Perceived Patient Workload and Its Impact on Outcomes During New Cancer Patient Visits: Analysis of a Convenience Sample.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- The lived experience of Chinese medical tourists receiving cancer care: A qualitative study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Rapid Histological Assessment of Prostate Specimens in the Three-dimensional Space by Hydrophilic Tissue Clearing and Confocal Microscopy.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2022Article
- Multidisciplinary clinics for colorectal cancer may not provide more efficient coordination of care.American journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Wait Times and Survival in Lung Cancer Patients across the Province of Quebec, Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- Primary Care Continuity and Wait Times to Receiving Breast Cancer Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study Using CanIMPACT Data.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- Implementing and Sustaining Early Cancer Diagnosis Initiatives in Canada: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- The psychological burden of waiting for procedures and patient-centred strategies that could support the mental health of wait-listed patients and caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- Waiting Times for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in a Nigerian Population.Journal of cancer epidemiology · 2021Article
- Attempts to Limit Censoring in Measures of Patient Satisfaction.Journal of patient experience · 2020Article
- Waiting times for prostate cancer: A review.Journal of public health research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient satisfaction is an important element of quality improvement and patient-centered care, and is an indicator of the public's confidence in the health care system. Although shorter wait times are believed intuitively to lead to higher satisfaction, studies have demonstrated the importance of many other factors which contribute to patients' satisfaction with their wait time experiences. The current study explores the factors that shape patients' satisfaction with their overall wait times (i.e. from symptom to treatment).
methodsWe conducted qualitative interviews with 60 breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer patients to examine the reasons behind patients' satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their wait time experiences. We purposefully recruited satisfied and unsatisfied participants from our larger survey sample. Using a semi-structured interview guide, patients were asked about their wait time experiences and the reasons behind their (dis)satisfaction. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using a thematic approach.
resultsPatients' perceptions of satisfaction with wait times were influenced by three interrelated dimensions: the interpersonal skills of treating physicians (which included expressions/demonstrations of empathy and concern, quality of information exchange, accountability for errors), coordination (which included assistance navigating the health system, scheduling of appointments, sharing information between providers, coordination in scheduling appointments, and sharing of information ), and timeliness of care (which referred to providers' responsiveness to patients' symptoms, coverage during provider absences, and shared sense of urgency between patient and providers). Providers' willingness to "trouble shoot" and acknowledge errors/delays were particularly influential in patients' overall perception of their wait times.
conclusionsWe described three dimensions of wait-related satisfaction: physicians' interpersonal skills, coordination of care, and timeliness of care, which are often interrelated and overlapping. Furthermore, while patients wait-related satisfaction was typically based on multiple interactions with different providers, positive or negative experiences with a single provider, often (but not always) the family physician, had a substantial impact on the overall satisfaction or dissatisfaction with wait time experiences. The findings provide a conceptual basis for the development of validated instruments to measure wait time-related patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.