Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26711494›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

Dissociable Learning Processes Underlie Human Pain Conditioning.

Suyi Zhang, Hiroaki Mano, Gowrishankar Ganesh, Trevor Robbins, Ben Seymour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Fear-potentiated startle reveals diminished threat extinction in pathological anxiety.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Computational perspectives on human fear and anxiety.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suyi ZhangCenter for Information and Neural Networks, National Institute for Information and Communications Technology, 1-4 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; Computational and Biological Learning Laboratory, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK. Electronic address: sz321@cam.ac.uk.
Hiroaki ManoCenter for Information and Neural Networks, National Institute for Information and Communications Technology, 1-4 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Gowrishankar GaneshCenter for Information and Neural Networks, National Institute for Information and Communications Technology, 1-4 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; CNRS-AIST JRL (Joint Robotics Laboratory), UMI3218/CRT, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8560, Japan.
Trevor RobbinsBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Site, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.
Ben SeymourCenter for Information and Neural Networks, National Institute for Information and Communications Technology, 1-4 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; Computational and Biological Learning Laboratory, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK; Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, 3-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Site, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK. Electronic address: bjs49@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pavlovian conditioning underlies many aspects of pain behavior, including fear and threat detection [1], escape and avoidance learning [2], and endogenous analgesia [3]. Although a central role for the amygdala is well established [4], both human and animal studies implicate other brain regions in learning, notably ventral striatum and cerebellum [5]. It remains unclear whether these regions make different contributions to a single aversive learning process or represent independent learning mechanisms that interact to generate the expression of pain-related behavior. We designed a human parallel aversive conditioning paradigm in which different Pavlovian visual cues probabilistically predicted thermal pain primarily to either the left or right arm and studied the acquisition of conditioned Pavlovian responses using combined physiological recordings and fMRI. Using computational modeling based on reinforcement learning theory, we found that conditioning involves two distinct types of learning process. First, a non-specific "preparatory" system learns aversive facial expressions and autonomic responses such as skin conductance. The associated learning signals-the learned associability and prediction error-were correlated with fMRI brain responses in amygdala-striatal regions, corresponding to the classic aversive (fear) learning circuit. Second, a specific lateralized system learns "consummatory" limb-withdrawal responses, detectable with electromyography of the arm to which pain is predicted. Its related learned associability was correlated with responses in ipsilateral cerebellar cortex, suggesting a novel computational role for the cerebellum in pain. In conclusion, our results show that the overall phenotype of conditioned pain behavior depends on two dissociable reinforcement learning circuits.

Indexed as

AdultAmygdalaAssociation LearningAvoidance LearningBrainCerebellumConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, PsychologicalCuesFearFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePainVentral Striatum

Identifiers

PMID26711494
PMCPMC4712170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.