Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26711441›Full record

ArticleMycotoxin research2016

Knowledge, attitude, and practices concerning presence of molds in foods among members of the general public in Malawi.

Limbikani Matumba, Maurice Monjerezi, Henry Kankwamba, Samuel M C Njoroge, Peter Ndilowe, Hilda Kabuli, Daimon Kambewa, Henry Njapau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycotoxin research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Aflatoxin exposure and health impacts: global burden and advances in detection technologies.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Limbikani MatumbaFood Technology and Nutrition Group, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (NRC campus), P.O Box 143, Lilongwe, Malawi. alimbikani@gmail.com.
Maurice MonjereziChancellor College, Department of Chemistry, University of Malawi, P.O. Box 280, Zomba, Malawi.
Henry KankwambaFaculty of Development Studies, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Bunda Campus), P.O Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Samuel M C NjorogeInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), P.O. Box 1096, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Peter NdiloweNational Institute for Scientific and Industrial Research (NISIR), International Airport Road, P.O 310158, Lusaka, Zambia.
Hilda KabuliNational Institute for Scientific and Industrial Research (NISIR), International Airport Road, P.O 310158, Lusaka, Zambia.
Daimon KambewaFaculty of Development Studies, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Bunda Campus), P.O Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Henry NjapauNational Institute for Scientific and Industrial Research (NISIR), International Airport Road, P.O 310158, Lusaka, Zambia.
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources · MWNational Institute for Scientific and Industrial Research · ZMUniversity of Malawi · MW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) of the public in Malawi on issues related to molds in foodstuffs. A survey involving structured questionnaire was conducted with 805 respondents from seven districts of Malawi. Descriptive statistics, t tests, and analyses of variance were calculated. A majority of respondents recognized that molds were dangerous to human health (88%); however, about 50% of respondents were not informed that mold toxins are thermally stable and that they are not destroyable by normal cooking processes. About 33% of the respondents asserted that they buy moldy maize, while approximately 20% of respondents reported that they consume moldy fruits having discarded moldy fraction. There were significant differences in knowledge scores among different demographic groups. Females had significantly (p < 0.05) lower knowledge scores on issues related to molds in foods. Additionally, the respondent's location had a significant effect. However, respondent's education had subtle effect on knowledge score and the overall population's knowledge score was generally low (3.55 ± 1.32 score out of 9). Results of the study underline the need to raise public's knowledge about health risks associated with spoilage molds in food and prevention and management options.

Indexed as

Food ContaminationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeEducationFeeding BehaviorFungiGeographyHumansMalawiSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudeFoodKnowledgeMalawiMoldPractice

Identifiers

PMID26711441
OpenAlexW2208025335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.