ArticlePreventive veterinary medicine2016
Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus introduction into the United States: Root cause investigation.
Article in Preventive veterinary medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Avian Diagnostic Pathology: Current Trends, Challenges and Future Directions: A Review.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Review
- Active Participatory Surveillance for Early Detection of Notifiable Pathogens: A Case Study of the U.S. Swine Industry.Viruses · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Multiplex TaqMan Real-Time PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of PEDV Genotypes G1, S-INDEL, and G2.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Are Visitor and Personnel Downtime Restrictions an Effective Biosecurity Measure to Prevent the Indirect Transmission of Pathogens to Livestock?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Postepidemic Epidemiology of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus in the United States.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2024Article
- Article
- Effectiveness of gilt acclimatization - improvement procedures in a farm with recurrent outbreaks of porcine epidemic diarrhea.Veterinary world · 2023Article
- Biosecurity and Mitigation Strategies to Control Swine Viruses in Feed Ingredients and Complete Feeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Global Dynamics of Porcine Enteric Coronavirus PEDV Epidemiology, Evolution, and Transmission.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Assessment of soy-based imports into the United States and associated foreign animal disease status.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Article
- Connecting livestock disease dynamics to human learning and biosecurity decisions.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Anti-viral triterpenes: a review.Phytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe · 2022Review
- Effect of mixing and feed batch sequencing on the prevalence and distribution of African swine fever virus in swine feed.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Article
- Article
- Risk and Mitigation of African Swine Fever Virus in Feed.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- The risk of viral transmission in feed: What do we know, what do we do?Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2020Review
- Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV): An update on etiology, transmission, pathogenesis, and prevention and control.Virus research · 2020Review
- Rapid Selective Detection of Potentially Infectious Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Coronavirus Exposed to Heat Treatments Using Viability RT-qPCR.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Tumor suppressor p53 inhibits porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection via interferon-mediated antiviral immunity.Molecular immunology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) was identified in the United States in the spring of 2013, and professionals from many parts of the U.S. swine industry responded rapidly to understand and control the newly emerging disease. In less than two months, the disease had spread to more than 200 herds in thirteen states. Experts from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) engaged in laboratory diagnostics, analytic support, epidemiology expertise, and data management to facilitate the effort. By 2014, a great deal had been learned about the disease; however, the question of how it entered the United States remained unanswered. In 2014, USDA formed an investigative group to address the question and leverage current knowledge with resources and partnerships not readily available to non-federal investigators. The group formed collaborations with other government and non-government organizations and individuals, and followed many avenues of inquiry; ultimately arriving at a small number of scenarios that describe possible mechanisms for PED introduction. For a scenario to be plausible, it had to explain: contamination of a person or product in the source country, its transit and entry to the United States, rapid dispersal across a wide geographic area, and exposure/infection of pigs. It had to be compatible with findings of swine herd investigations and research studies. Potential products had to have been imported legally during the time prior to the beginning of the epidemic, or delivered to the United States through prohibited channels. Follow-up studies were initiated to gather more evidence for the most plausible scenarios. Of the scenarios, flexible intermediate bulk containers ("feed totes") used to transport bulk feed serving as fomites for movement of PED virus provided the simplest explanation for the accumulated findings of the investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.