ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2016
Rectocele repair with stapled transvaginal rectal resection.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical interventions for posterior compartment prolapse and obstructed defecation symptoms: a systematic review with clinical practice recommendations.International urogynecology journal · 2019Pooled it
- Khubchandani's procedure combined with stapled posterior rectal wall resection for rectocele.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Trial
- Rectal-vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele.BMC women's health · 2021Article
- Stapled trans-anal rectal resection can improve constipation symptoms and inflammatory reaction of patients with outlet obstructive constipation.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Stapled transanal rectal resection for the treatment of rectocele associated with obstructed defecation syndrome: a large series of 262 consecutive patients.Techniques in coloproctology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConstipation is a clinical symptom in patients suffering from slow transit and/or obstructed defecation. Proper treatment requires the identification of all associated disorders and the quantification of symptoms. Rectocele can cause the symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of a novel technique of transvaginal stapled rectal resection (TVSRR) using a straight staple line, to treat rectocele.
methodsThe study included 84 females [median age 51 years (range 29-73 years)], with obstructed defecation, grades II-III rectocele, and multiple abnormalities on defecography. The magnitude and degree of ODS were quantified by the Altomare ODS scoring system. Continence status was evaluated using the Pescatori scoring system. The rectal and vaginal manometric study, the index of patient satisfaction using a visual analog score (VAS), and the validated Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaire results were recorded. All patients underwent TVSRR.
resultsThere were no intraoperative complications. Early postoperative complications were defecatory urgency in seven patients (8.3 %), dyspareunia in two (2.4 %), and rectovaginal fistula in one (1.2 %). Five patients (6 %) had recurrence of ODS symptoms. There was no significant change in continence pre- and postoperatively. The ODS score and VAS revealed significant improvement within the first postoperative year in 94 % of patients. The PAC-QOL questionnaire mean total scores indicated an improvement in both the patient satisfaction and the QOL during the 12-month follow-up. The self-reported definitive outcome was excellent in 46 patients (54.7 %), good in 29 (34.5 %), fairly good in 20 (23.8 %), and poor in five (6.0 %).
conclusionsVaginal repair carries no risk of fecal incontinence. Large anterior rectocele is considered the main indication for this technique. Using the linear stapler is a cost-effective, simple, and easy technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.