Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26710924›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2016

Racial disparities in overall survival among renal cell carcinoma patients with young age and small tumors.

Kendra Schwartz, Julie J Ruterbusch, Joanne S Colt, David C Miller, Wong-Ho Chow, Mark P Purdue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Ethnic disparities in renal cell carcinoma: An analysis of Hispanic patients in a single-payer healthcare system.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Epigenetic basis of cancer health disparities: Looking beyond genetic differences.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kendra SchwartzDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Julie J RuterbuschPopulation Studies and Disparities Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan.
Joanne S ColtDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
David C MillerDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medicine School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Wong-Ho ChowDepartment of Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Mark P PurdueDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

Cancer Risk in Human PopulationsZIACP010136 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI PURDUE, MARK · 2009 to 2025
$36.7M
NCI NIH HHS N02-CP-11004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the overall survival of a population-based cohort of black and white patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to better understand the paradox of poorer RCC survival despite more frequent diagnosis at lower stage among blacks. Renal cell carcinoma patients (699 white, 252 black) diagnosed between 2002 and 2007 in metropolitan Detroit were followed for vital status in the Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry. Hazard ratios (HR) of death for black versus white race and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models stratified by demographic and prognostic factors, and in models successively adjusted for clinical factors, comorbidities, and socioeconomic factors. Mean follow-up time was 88.4 months for white patients and 89.6 months for black patients (P = 0.49), with 202 white deaths and 89 black deaths (P = 0.06). While black race was weakly associated with poorer overall survival (P = 0.053), black patients <65 years at diagnosis or with tumors <4 cm in size had significantly poorer survival than their white counterparts (HR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.06-2.01 and HR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.51-3.06, respectively). The racial disparities within these two subgroups were minimally affected by adjustment for clinical/treatment factors (HR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.19 and HR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.27-2.99), but were substantially reduced when renal-relevant comorbidities were added (HR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.89-1.91 and HR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.16-2.66). After further adjustment for socioeconomic factors, the survival disparities were essentially null (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.71-1.85 and HR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.67-1.98). In this population-based sample of RCC patients, younger black patients and those with small tumors had poorer overall survival than whites. The disparity was explained primarily by racial differences in renal-relevant comorbidities, particularly chronic renal failure, and socioeconomic deprivation. Future research should focus on younger patients and those with smaller tumors to better understand how these factors may contribute to the survival disparity.

Indexed as

EthnicityHealthcare DisparitiesAge FactorsCarcinoma, Renal CellCase-Control StudiesComorbidityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIllinoisKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney NeoplasmsMaleMichiganPopulation SurveillanceProportional Hazards ModelsAgeracerenal cell carcinomasurvivaltumor size

Identifiers

PMID26710924
PMCPMC4735764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.