Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26710854›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

In Silico Gene-Level Evolution Explains Microbial Population Diversity through Differential Gene Mobility.

Bram van Dijk, Paulien Hogeweg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bram van DijkDepartment of Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Utrecht University, The Netherlands b.vandijk@uu.nl.
Paulien HogewegDepartment of Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities can show astonishing ecological and phylogenetic diversity. What is the role of pervasive horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in shaping this diversity in the presence of clonally expanding "killer strains"? Does HGT of antibiotic production and resistance genes erase phylogenetic structure? To answer these questions, we study a spatial eco-evolutionary model of prokaryotes, inspired by recent findings on antagonistic interactions in Vibrionaceae populations. We find toxin genes evolve to be highly mobile, whereas resistance genes minimize mobility. This differential gene mobility is a requirement to maintain a diverse and dynamic ecosystem. The resistance gene repertoire acts as a core genome that corresponds to the phylogeny of cells, whereas toxin genes do not follow this phylogeny and have a patchy distribution. We also show that interstrain HGT makes the emergent phylogenetic structure robust to selective sweeps. Finally, in this evolved ecosystem we observe antagonistic interactions between, rather than within, spatially structure subpopulations, as has been previously observed for prokaryotes in soils and oceans. In contrast to ascribing the diversification and evolution of microbial communities to clonal dynamics, we show that multilevel evolution can elegantly explain the observed phylogenetic structure and ecosystem diversity.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, BacterialGene Transfer, HorizontalPolymorphism, GeneticAntibiosisBacterial ToxinsComputer SimulationVibrionaceaeBacterial Toxinsaccessory genomeantagonistic interactionscore genomediversityeco-evolutionary dynamicsflexible genomesgene-level selectiongene mobilityHGThorizontal gene transfermicrobial evolutionmultilevel evolutionresistancetoxin

Identifiers

PMID26710854
PMCPMC4758251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.