Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26710352›Full record

ReviewBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2016

The evolution of anticoagulant therapy.

Massimo Franchini, Giancarlo M Liumbruno, Carlo Bonfanti, Giuseppe Lippi

Open access · greenAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Abelacimab: A leap forward in anticoagulation with FXI and FXIa Inhibition.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Dry Needling and Antithrombotic Drugs.Pain research & management · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Massimo FranchiniDepartment of Haematology and Transfusion Medicine, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantua, Italy.
Giancarlo M LiumbrunoItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Carlo BonfantiDepartment of Haematology and Transfusion Medicine, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantua, Italy.
Giuseppe LippiSection of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arterial and venous thromboembolism are leading causes of morbidity and mortality around the world. For almost 70 years, heparins (unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparins) and vitamin K antagonists have been the leading therapeutic medical options for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disorders. Nevertheless, the many limitations of these traditional anticoagulants have fuelled the search for novel agents over the past 15 years, and a new class of oral anticoagulants that specifically target activated factor X and thrombin has been developed and is now commercially available. In this narrative review, the evolution of anticoagulant therapy is summarised, with a focus on newer oral anticoagulants.

Indexed as

Administration, OralFactor Xa InhibitorsHeparinHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansVenous ThromboembolismVitamin KFactor Xa InhibitorsHeparinVitamin K

Identifiers

PMID26710352
PMCPMC4781787
OpenAlexW2311107034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.