Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26709987›Full record

ArticleCancer2016

Oncolytic reovirus in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer patients with KRAS-activated tumors.

Miguel A Villalona-Calero, Elaine Lam, Gregory A Otterson, Weiqiang Zhao, Matthew Timmons, Deepa Subramaniam, Erinn M Hade, George M Gill, Matthew Coffey, Giovanni Selvaggi and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cancer biotherapy: review and prospect.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Therapy with oncolytic viruses: progress and challenges.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Miguel A Villalona-CaleroDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Elaine LamDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Gregory A OttersonDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Weiqiang ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Matthew TimmonsOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Deepa SubramaniamLombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Erinn M HadeCenter for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
George M GillOncolytics Biotech, Incorporated, Calgary, Canada.
Matthew CoffeyOncolytics Biotech, Incorporated, Calgary, Canada.
Giovanni SelvaggiOncolytics Biotech, Incorporated, Calgary, Canada.
Erin BertinoDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Bo ChaoDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Michael V KnoppDepartment of Radiology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
The Ohio State University · USOncolytics Biotech (Canada) · CAThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe type 3 Dearing reovirus (Reolysin) is a naturally occurring virus that preferentially infects and causes oncolysis in tumor cells with a Ras-activated pathway. It induces host immunity and cell cycle arrest and acts synergistically with cytotoxic agents.

methodsThis study evaluated Reolysin combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic/recurrent KRAS-mutated or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated/amplified non-small cell lung cancer.

resultsThirty-seven patients were treated. Molecular alterations included 20 KRAS mutations, 10 EGFR amplifications, 3 EGFR mutations, and 4 BRAF-V600E mutations. In total, 242 cycles (median, 4; range, 1-47) were completed. The initial doses were area under the curve (AUC) 6 mg/mL/min for carboplatin, 200 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel on day 1, and 3 × 10(10) 50% tissue culture infective dose for Reolysin on days 1 to 5 of each 21-day cycle. Because of diarrhea and febrile neutropenia (in the first 2 patients), subsequent doses were reduced to 175 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel and AUC 5 mg/mL/min for carboplatin. Toxicities included fatigue, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, neutropenia, arthralgia/myalgia, anorexia, and electrolyte abnormalities. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0 responses included the following: partial response for 11 patients, stable disease (SD) for 20 patients, progressive disease for 4 patients, and not evaluable for 2 patients (objective response rate, 31%; 90% 1-sided lower confidence interval, 21%). Four SD patients had >40% positron emission tomography standardized uptake value reductions. The median progression-free survival, median overall survival, and 12-month overall survival rate were 4 months, 13.1 months, and 57%, respectively. Seven patients were alive after a median follow-up of 34.2 months; they included 2 patients without disease progression at 37 and 50 months.

conclusionsReolysin in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin was well tolerated. The observed response rate suggests a benefit of the reovirus for chemotherapy. A follow-up randomized study is recommended. The proportion of patients surviving longer than 2 years (30%) suggests a second/third-line treatment effect or possibly the triggering of an immune response after tumor reovirus infiltration.

Indexed as

Mammalian orthoreovirus 3Oncolytic VirotherapyAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingAntineoplastic AgentsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)BRAFepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)KRASlung canceroncolytic virus

Identifiers

PMID26709987
PMCPMC5068485
OpenAlexW2217220665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.